I have a 30-06 and 223 scoped bolt actions, and I am looking something between the two. I think I have narrowed it down to my neighbors Ruger 77 in 7mm-08 or the locall pawn shop has a Remington 788 in 243. The Ruger does not have a scope, but it comes with rings, a timney? trigger in the package, and some ammo and brass. It is in great shape, and has had about 100 rounds from the original owner. The Remington is at a pawnshop so the history is unknown, the outside is kind of rough, but the bore looks good, and it comes with a leupold 2x7 vxII. Both guns are blued with wood and no iron sights. The price is about the same (around 250-275) which is a better gun? Better round? It will be used for plinking and varmits, I reload and have dies for both, and from an estate sale I have about 1500 7mm bullets but if I bought the 243 I could always sell them so its not realy an issue. I like the removable mag of tht 788, but the Ruger has the trigger....... what should I do? (besides buying them both)