Cut corners and cheapened up a bit? That's like saying the Titanic had a problem with leaks! The receiver was soft steel, the stock amazingly cheap, the bolt had plastic parts, and the receiver had plastic inserts just to make it run. It was such a turkey that it lasted what, 5 years? What other major firearms company produced a rifle that had such a short run? The Savage was kicking Remington's butt in the cheaper market with a rifle that was comparable to the 700. Early 710's were actually priced five cents higher than the 110! The 710 was akin to Picasso drawing an X on a piece of paper and shoving it to the crowd. It must be fine art, it is a Picasso!
Personally, I thought it pretty brazen that Remington even offered it. I can't think of another product from another company, from razors to cars to tools that was such a cynical, almost insulting, play for a market based solely on name recognition. Savage produces a product of the 700 caliber but at a cheaper price, mostly because of the more cost-effective barrel mounting and using a blind magazine. And, when Savage introduced the Stevens 200 in a kind of one up to Remington, at $100 less than the introduced price of the 710, it proved that Remington was, quite simply, playing the shooting community for fools.
Alrighty then, the 710 is gone, replace by the "improved" 770. They discarded the grey stock and are now dealing with black, like all other synthetic stocks out there other than the Stevens 200. Let's see how long the 770 lasts before they rename it or drop it altogether.
Davis