I've done it with .32 S&W, .32 Auto, .32 S&W Long, .327 Federal (double ball) .44 Mag (single and double ball), and .30-30 Win (and maybe .444 Marlin). Others in my family have done it with .32 S&W Long, .38 Special, and .41 Mag.
I haven't really chased after impressive velocities, though. I've done it for 'pip squeak' loads.
Seating depth and powder charge (if any) may require some experimentation.
'Pip squeak' loads often don't respond in the way you may expect. In my experience, the smaller the case, the more temperamental it will be.
As Clark mentioned -
Small differences in the load can cause a substantial change in performance. With one of the .32 S&W Long experiments, we had round balls bouncing off corrugated cardboard, with standard small pistol primers, the ball seated with the 'ogive' just inside the case mouth, and a mild crimp. (.32 S&W, with the same 'load', just kept squibbing.)
Increasing the crimp, with no other changes, yielded penetration through 6 layers of cardboard.
Adding a 1 gr powder charge (may have been Bullseye) gave us squibs and bore obstructions.
No powder charge and magnum primers yielded no penetration.
Magnum primers, no powder charge, and a really heavy crimp penetrated something like 12 layers of cardboard, before before ricocheting off the backstop and around the walls of the concrete test facility ...hitting me in the chest, behind the shooter.
(It didn't hurt much.
)
Using primers alone, there are a lot of different performance levels that can be found just by varying crimp and seating depth.
Adding powder just complicates things.
There's a point where the powder will act as a cushion, and slow the projectile's acceleration (from the primer), without burning much. With a little more powder, they turn to squibs. The squibs will actually get worse and worse, until you reach the threshold where the powder can maintain enough pressure for a proper burn. Then, you suddenly jump from squibs to the equivalent of turn-of-the-century police loads.