Most likely they are equivalent. Same lock back force, and similar stored energy. I can calculate for you if you provide with the following info.
The length of the spring section stick out of the slide before compression. The slide's distance of travel to lock back.
The replacement spring is definitely stiffer, in terms of lbf/inch, or its Hooks constant. Since it has shorter natural length, Its compression force when installed in slide could be lower, so that energy stored when the slide locks back is the same as the original spring. I need the info to calculate.
On the other hand, I would shoot it to see how it works. If it works reliably, I wouldn't care.
-TL
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk