youngunz4life
New member
hopefully I'm not barking up the wrong tree here, but what are the laws about defending yourself against a family member who could be abusing you?
*newslink at bottom*
This could be spouse, parent, or child but the national news about this TX judge who was videotaped by his daughter whipping her with a belt 7 years ago made me ponder this issue. She is 23 now and statute of limitations has resulted in no charges whether they were justified or not justified. Remember, this girl was not considered a child during the beating when she was 16. The feds just said there will be no charges, and all laws in TX for child abuse, etc are 14 and under. Well, I guess she was still a minor.
When I was a kid(really, really small) one guy in my area killed his dad with a hatchet or ax because he was being abused(as well as his sister who was sexually abused I think too). He walked scotfree with pretty much no issue. SADLY, this boy/man killed himself as did his younger sister years later on the anniversary of her brother's death.
I mean if this girl who was beat by her dad said, "yeah I had a camera the last couple days but tonight I have changed strategies" as she pulls out a 357 handgun. legal? moral? right? wrong?
anyways, if he backed off I guess she would have to not shoot, but when people get in a family rage who knows what idiot decision dad would make as she is a trigger pull away from sending him by-by. of course - like most situations - some people would side with the daughter and others with the dad in this case in the news, but that doesn't change the fact of whether this girl could've defended herself with a firearm if she felt repeatedly threatened or in fear of great bodily harm?
http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/03/justice/texas-video-beating/index.html?hpt=ju_c2
*newslink at bottom*
This could be spouse, parent, or child but the national news about this TX judge who was videotaped by his daughter whipping her with a belt 7 years ago made me ponder this issue. She is 23 now and statute of limitations has resulted in no charges whether they were justified or not justified. Remember, this girl was not considered a child during the beating when she was 16. The feds just said there will be no charges, and all laws in TX for child abuse, etc are 14 and under. Well, I guess she was still a minor.
When I was a kid(really, really small) one guy in my area killed his dad with a hatchet or ax because he was being abused(as well as his sister who was sexually abused I think too). He walked scotfree with pretty much no issue. SADLY, this boy/man killed himself as did his younger sister years later on the anniversary of her brother's death.
I mean if this girl who was beat by her dad said, "yeah I had a camera the last couple days but tonight I have changed strategies" as she pulls out a 357 handgun. legal? moral? right? wrong?
anyways, if he backed off I guess she would have to not shoot, but when people get in a family rage who knows what idiot decision dad would make as she is a trigger pull away from sending him by-by. of course - like most situations - some people would side with the daughter and others with the dad in this case in the news, but that doesn't change the fact of whether this girl could've defended herself with a firearm if she felt repeatedly threatened or in fear of great bodily harm?
http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/03/justice/texas-video-beating/index.html?hpt=ju_c2