Prism scopes

2damnold4this

New member
I've been thinking of replacing a red dot with some sort of prism scope that is light weight but has some magnification. What are some options that have worked for you?
 

mikejonestkd

New member
I have primary arms micro and Burris prism optics and they are both good quality and a decent value for the money.
Personally I like the Burris RT-3 and RT-5 slightly better than the Primary arms, but only because I like the reticle better.
 

zukiphile

New member
2do said:
I've been thinking of replacing a red dot ...

What is it about the red dot you don't like? I have a bunch of prism optics I like because the idea of battery dependence bothers me even of a battery can last for years, I don't care for the tinted image, and I find the eye relief more forgiving than with conventional scopes.

I have several Bushnell Lil P 1x Prisms I like quite a bit. They still come up on the used market. The center dot is 2moa with a footprint about the same as a Daniel Defense fixed rear sight. With the diopter adjusted for my eye the image is actually slightly reduced from 1x, but perfectly sharp, much like looking through an aperture sight, but without the alignment issues. I can shoot precisely with it, but identifying what I am shooting isn't aided much. Atibal still sells a 1x prism in that very small format.

A 1.5x optic is surprising helpful in figuring out what I am seeing, but it isn't so much magnification that my standing wobble becomes a distraction. I don't have a Primary Arms 2x prism, but I'd bet it would be good too.

There are a lot of 3x prisms in the current market. If that's your choice, it seems that getting the reticle you like would be the driving consideration.

Swampfox makes a 3x that is said to have an extraordinary field of view. I wonder how important that is on a rifle sight. If I'm focused on a three inch target 50 yards away with a 2 or moa dot, I don't see how the things 20 feet on either side need to be visible through my optic.
 

2damnold4this

New member
Thanks for the great advice and suggestions.

In answer to zukiphile, I'm looking for a light weight optic to go on a 16" pencil barrel 5.56 upper that I carry at the hunting land while I change camera cards during the off season or after the freezer is full during the regular season. The potential targets are coyotes and the less likely feral pig. A red dot has worked for me in the past but my eyes aren't what they used to be and I wasn't 100% on an eight inch plate at 114 yards with the red dot this last range session. It's still very easy to hit the plate when looking through a scope, even at low magnification with a 3x9 or an LPVO but I didn't perform as well as I wanted with the red dot this last time.
 

tangolima

New member
You can't see the target, or you can't put the shots on target? For the latter, magnification probably won't help. 8" at 100m is still much bigger than 2moa dot.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

FrankenMauser

New member
My only prism is a Vortex Spitfire 5x.
I haven't had it long.

But I like it.
Adjustments are coarse - 1 MoA per click.
But that is good enough for what I have it on - and probably your intended application.

Some people think 5x is too much, and believe the 3x model is superior. But I like the magnification. Gives me enough to better identify targets, without being overbearing like 6x+ would be.

I have learned a lot in the last year, having jumped into competition shooting. And I can tell you unequivocally that learning the reticle in whatever you choose to buy will be very beneficial.
Know those subtensions, dots, etc. They can be very useful.
 

2damnold4this

New member
You can't see the target, or you can't put the shots on target? For the latter, magnification probably won't help. 8" at 100m is still much bigger than 2moa dot.

The dot is more of a smear than a dot for me these days. Using an LPVO at 1x, it's easy to get hits. I can get hits a little bit quicker at 3x. I'd like an optic that is lighter than the LPVOs but has a reticle I can see clearly and some magnification is a plus.
 

mikejonestkd

New member
The dot is more of a smear than a dot for me these days.

I am getting older too and have Astigmatism, so even quality red dots are blurry to me.
A prism is an excellent choice for your intended purpose
 

tangolima

New member
The dot is more of a smear than a dot for me these days. Using an LPVO at 1x, it's easy to get hits. I can get hits a little bit quicker at 3x. I'd like an optic that is lighter than the LPVOs but has a reticle I can see clearly and some magnification is a plus.
I see.

I have near sight, astigmatism, and aging. Have been wearing progressive prescription lenses. It is still ok to use dot. But the ability to pick out target, especially in low light has much degraded.

Prism scopes sound a good option. I quite like lpvo.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

zukiphile

New member
2D said:
I've been thinking of replacing a red dot with some sort of prism scope...

I'd be interested to read where you end up on this.

Where someone is coming from may influence what sort of prism he likes. You are coming from a RDS with which you were happy until you though you needed a bit of help. I came from iron sights and wasn't as put off by a lack of magnification as some might be. Perhaps people coming from LPVOs would put greater emphasis on magnification and tolerate complexity better.
 
Top