Well I think I am very qualified to answer this one. I own both! I bought my SLR-95 back in 97 for 349.00 NIB from a gun shop in Seattle. It is a very nice AK and is considered one of the better POSTban offerinfs of all of the AK's out there. You're right, it is well made, better than average accuracy for an AK and is well made with a rock solid milled rcvr. It shoots nice, and is very solid. The VEPR II is a step up IRT quality and accuracy. The VEPR II is made from a RPK rcvr and as such is about .5mm thicker than the normal rcvr's. The fit finsih is better than the SLR, but not by much. The barrel is deffinitley better, in the .223, it is a semi bull barrel and is really nice. Some people don't care for the front site, but I like it just fine. The VEPR II comes with a side rail, ther SLR doesn't. That is not a big deal as you can add one yourself for 25 bucks...
Iagree, the SLR is a nice looking AK, especially when you swap out the parts and add a pistol grip/buttstock kit to make it look like it is suppose too instead of that butt ugly sporter buttstock.
I like them both, but if I had to pick just one, I would go with my VEPR II, it is more accurate and is a nicer finished gun. BUt again, the SLR is a fine weapon also...You should be able to find a good SLR for 500.00 or less. There aren't too many NIB SLR's out there so check it out really good. If it is more than 500, I would deffinitely get the VEPR II. The VEPR's are 479.00 dealer cost for the .223 and the 7.62x39 is 10 bucks cheaper..