Poll on new purchase, 9mm or .40S&W
- Thread starter labhound
- Start date
I just went through this and purchased the PX4 in 9mm. Just my opinion but I believe the 9mm is about at good at the 40 S&W with less recoil and cheaper ammo. Nothing wrong with the 40 S&W at all, but the current ammunition available puts 9mm, 40 S&W and 357 sig in the same ball park. Check out this link to Winchester LEO ammo and make your own choice;
http://www.winchester.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/flash-SWFs/law_bullit.swf
http://www.winchester.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/flash-SWFs/law_bullit.swf
I can't speak to the SR40, as I've only shot the SR9 and SR9c, but I did enjoy the platform in 9mm in my limited experience with it. I don't know how the SR40 shoots, and I also haven't talked to anyone in person who has shot it yet. I can't say I know what the internet consensus on it is, either.
I typically favor 9mm (or .45) to .40 by a little, but I also think that .40 is where the recoil-dampening effects of the PX4 platform's rotating-barrel action really shine. The PX4 pistols (aside from the Subcompact) are softer-shooting than any other comparable polymer-framed service pistol in each of its respective calibers, in my experience, and I think the difference between the PX4 and others is most noticeable in .40. When I get around to buying a PX4, it will most definitely be in .40 (and then later in 9mm
). I still think it's awesome in 9mm, though.
So, I would vote for the SR9/SR9c and the PX4 in .40.
I typically favor 9mm (or .45) to .40 by a little, but I also think that .40 is where the recoil-dampening effects of the PX4 platform's rotating-barrel action really shine. The PX4 pistols (aside from the Subcompact) are softer-shooting than any other comparable polymer-framed service pistol in each of its respective calibers, in my experience, and I think the difference between the PX4 and others is most noticeable in .40. When I get around to buying a PX4, it will most definitely be in .40 (and then later in 9mm
). I still think it's awesome in 9mm, though.So, I would vote for the SR9/SR9c and the PX4 in .40.
zombieslayer
New member
I prefer .40, but thats just my preference. Which do you prefer? I dont notice much difference in recoil. But then, I work with my hands.
zombieslayer
New member
Ive not shot either of the guns in .40, but its my SD caliber of choice. Its really not the recoiling beast the internet would have you believe. I also own guns in 9mm and 45acp so i have shot all three rounds extensively. Id say try out one .40 and decide if you like it rather than buy two guns in a new caliber. Just my 2cents. But I like just about every gun i shoot.
postmaster
New member
cheaper is better
The 9mil is strong enough to do any duty and much cheaper. Also less recoil. I use a glock 26 and its super.
The 9mil is strong enough to do any duty and much cheaper. Also less recoil. I use a glock 26 and its super.
one .40 and one 9mm
I would purchase and 40 in one and a 9mm in the other, that way you have one in each caliber and dont regret not buying a 9mm or not buying a 40. You could switch it up in carry and at the range that way you never get bored with either caliber. Just my opinion.
I would purchase and 40 in one and a 9mm in the other, that way you have one in each caliber and dont regret not buying a 9mm or not buying a 40. You could switch it up in carry and at the range that way you never get bored with either caliber. Just my opinion.
Who is buying ammo?
If you are buying your own ammo, go for the nine. If you work for an agency that provides your ammo, go for the .40, if that's what they issue.
Expand your choices to include guns with more aftermarket parts, better holster selection and good customer support. Does anyone make drop in trigger jobs for Ruger or Beretta? Glock and M&P score big on aftermarket parts.
Do you reload cast bullets? Make sure your new choice does not have a polygonal barrel. Glock and H&K come to mind. Check them out.
Whichever you buy, shoot one first.
If you are buying your own ammo, go for the nine. If you work for an agency that provides your ammo, go for the .40, if that's what they issue.
Expand your choices to include guns with more aftermarket parts, better holster selection and good customer support. Does anyone make drop in trigger jobs for Ruger or Beretta? Glock and M&P score big on aftermarket parts.
Do you reload cast bullets? Make sure your new choice does not have a polygonal barrel. Glock and H&K come to mind. Check them out.
Whichever you buy, shoot one first.
9mm is great for target, but if your going to have to use it for protection, its not very good. the 9mm travels so fast and runs a high chance of over penetration, and does not get a chance to do what its designed to do. The 40 is the prefect combo of the .45 and 9mm its not as loud and doesn't kick as hard as a 45 but is a little larger and hits harder then the 9mm.
LockedBreech
New member
I have the PX4 in .40 and it shoots like a 9. 9s I have shot for reference are the Sig 226, Beretta 92, Walther PPS, Stoeger Cougar, and Glock 19. I shoot the .40 PX4 as fast as all, faster than a few.
Of course, I've said it before and I'll say it again, I think the "harsh recoil" and "snappiness" of the .40 must be in the opinion of folks with 1" wrists. To me, with medium/large hands, the 9, .40, and .45 feel virtually identical with only tiny differences in follow-up shots.
I actually agree with Jim243 and Austin here. As a PX4 .40 owner I am close to picking up a SR9c I think.
Of course, I've said it before and I'll say it again, I think the "harsh recoil" and "snappiness" of the .40 must be in the opinion of folks with 1" wrists. To me, with medium/large hands, the 9, .40, and .45 feel virtually identical with only tiny differences in follow-up shots.
I actually agree with Jim243 and Austin here. As a PX4 .40 owner I am close to picking up a SR9c I think.
Get R Done Guns
New member
Do you know how many LE officers are carrying this in your opinion "inadequate" round? Well more than 50%. The 9mm is a top choice in all regards. Both are great rounds, both will perform well, and both are "fairly" affordable to shoot.
As to the question at hand? I would get the SR9C as well. Gives you the best of both worlds as far as size goes. As for caliber that is completely up to the shooter. 9mm would get the vote here, but both will do.
Like you, I've always been a little puzzled by the .40's reputation for surly recoil. I have to pay close attention to tell the difference in recoil between 9mm, .40, and .45, but then again I was shooting hot .41 Mag at age 11 and loving it.
Nevertheless, it's clear that .40 really does bother a lot of people, especially in a polymer-framed gun. My assessment of the PX4's recoil in .40 has a lot to do with seeing a good number of people who hated shooting .40 in other polymer pistols say "hey, that wasn't bad" when shooting the PX4.No offense, but there's a lot of bad info in that post.
In many cases, a .40 S&W pistol can be converted to 9mm or .357 Sig with a barrel change (and in the case of 9mm different magazines). It doesn't work as well going from 9mm to the other two.
The SR pistols are fairly new, but shortly someone will make a conversion kit so you can convert your .40 into a 9mm or a .357 Sig. So buying the .40 version of both guns really gives you three calibers instead of just one.
The SR pistols are fairly new, but shortly someone will make a conversion kit so you can convert your .40 into a 9mm or a .357 Sig. So buying the .40 version of both guns really gives you three calibers instead of just one.
bitttorrrent
New member
the conversions always sound good on paper, but when they come out they are always very expensive and don't work well.
i have the px4 in 9mm and it is a great gun. looked at sr9, but the beretta won out as is smoother with the rotating barrel and the ruger is so new.
just from the forums i was expecting my px4 9mm to shoot like a 22. Had been shooting .45. But it is still a powerful weapon and those discounting the 9mm should think again. No, it won't stop an elephant, but 17 rounds in one spot will sure do something that i would not want to be on the other end of.
i have the px4 in 9mm and it is a great gun. looked at sr9, but the beretta won out as is smoother with the rotating barrel and the ruger is so new.
just from the forums i was expecting my px4 9mm to shoot like a 22. Had been shooting .45. But it is still a powerful weapon and those discounting the 9mm should think again. No, it won't stop an elephant, but 17 rounds in one spot will sure do something that i would not want to be on the other end of.