http://www.kob.com/archive/2002/june/04/concealedweapons.htm
Baca, the guy who sued, is gloating.
However, it appears that the entire law was struck down solely because of the "opt-out" provision. The courts appearently said that the CCW statute was lawful in terms of not violating the state constitution. However, the "opt out" provisions violated the state's equal protection clause, and therefor the entire law is void.
Scratch one off from the shall-issue rolls. Though, the law itself was very poor.
Baca, the guy who sued, is gloating.
However, it appears that the entire law was struck down solely because of the "opt-out" provision. The courts appearently said that the CCW statute was lawful in terms of not violating the state constitution. However, the "opt out" provisions violated the state's equal protection clause, and therefor the entire law is void.
Scratch one off from the shall-issue rolls. Though, the law itself was very poor.