A matter of personal preference
steveno wrote:
I just bought a M-57 6 inch and nickel in 95% condition for $425 so there isn't any way I would pay more than $300 for a M-58
If you like your M57, it's possible you're about where I was a couple of years ago - - I had no idea I'd have to pay as much as I did for a 58. Yep, the M57 has the nice adjustable sights and a choice of lengths, and it may not make sense to many people, but a 58 will bring MORE than a 57 in equivalent condition.
When you analyze the situation, it begins to compute. The 58 was only produced 1964 through 77, for a total of a little over 20,000. The 57 also started in 64 but continued until 1993. I can't find the number produced, but some estimates indicate at least four times as many as the 58s. A majority of 58s were probably issued to various police agencies, and compared to the 57, they weren't nearly so popular with sportsmen, target shooters,
silueta shooters, and handgun hunters. Hence the far lower production.
Same situation applies to the Model 24-3 (1983 reintroduction of the 1950 .44 Target) and the old 21 (1950 .44 Military.) The adjustable sight .44 Special doesn't bring as much as the fixed sight version.
I'm certainly not saying you're wrong in YOUR assessment of the relative value, but a lot of shooters and collectors don't agree with you. I passed up at least five M57s (two four-inch and three six-inch) in the $275 to $350 range, because I really wanted either an old model, short barrel, .41 Blackhawk or an M58. I finally paid $400 for a mechanically perfect middle-production 58 with noticible holster wear, and was glad to get it!
To each his own . . . .
Best,
Johnny