GetYerShells
New member
Good morning everyone, I have a question to those who have had experience with Beretta's M9A1 and 92FS. Yesterday I had to qualify on the M9. During the classroom portion as we were field stripping the guns and so forth I noticed the trigger on these guns were horrible. Now mind you I know the guns the military uses for instruction are quite often in not so great condition.
These guns however looked like they had only seen maybe a few hundred rounds. They looked like they were in pristine condition. I just couldn't get over how jerky and inconsistant that first double action trigger pull was. I mean I squeezed the trigger the same way I squeeze my Sig. Just a firm, consistant squeeze until the gun goes "bang" but on the M9 it was just aweful. So my question is, could this be because the guns were newer? or does the M-9/92FS have a track record of bad DA trigger pulls? Any thoughts, or input would be appreciated.
Oh I guess I should mention, in SA I thought shooting the M9 was quite pleasant, just the DA I thought was the worst trigger I have ever seen on a pistol in my life.
These guns however looked like they had only seen maybe a few hundred rounds. They looked like they were in pristine condition. I just couldn't get over how jerky and inconsistant that first double action trigger pull was. I mean I squeezed the trigger the same way I squeeze my Sig. Just a firm, consistant squeeze until the gun goes "bang" but on the M9 it was just aweful. So my question is, could this be because the guns were newer? or does the M-9/92FS have a track record of bad DA trigger pulls? Any thoughts, or input would be appreciated.
Oh I guess I should mention, in SA I thought shooting the M9 was quite pleasant, just the DA I thought was the worst trigger I have ever seen on a pistol in my life.