This just came to me the other night while reading about various calibers, loads and JHP performance.
One problem with LSWC bullets, historically, has been their propensity to lead up the bore. If you make them harder, they don't expand. Make them soft, such as the Remington .38 Special 158gr LSWC-HP +P and they can quickly lead up the bore.
Speer and others have half-jacketed LSWC bullets in the past, but typically the lead is fairly hard when compared to the "FBI load" or a swaged LSWC. And with the Speer half-jacket, I've seen the end result looking like a wadcutter because the HP nose expanded then sheered off where the jacketing started.
So the question is...
Could a LSWC be made in two parts?
This would give you a LSWC capable of being driven faster than a swaged bullet, but the HP nose would expand like a swaged bullet. Obviously separation of the two pieces needs to be avoided.
Other than it'd be more expensive than a standard LSWC, the performance could be excellent for self-defense ammo.
Is this idea all wet? Too goofy? Pie in the sky? Anyone know if it's ever been tried?
One problem with LSWC bullets, historically, has been their propensity to lead up the bore. If you make them harder, they don't expand. Make them soft, such as the Remington .38 Special 158gr LSWC-HP +P and they can quickly lead up the bore.
Speer and others have half-jacketed LSWC bullets in the past, but typically the lead is fairly hard when compared to the "FBI load" or a swaged LSWC. And with the Speer half-jacket, I've seen the end result looking like a wadcutter because the HP nose expanded then sheered off where the jacketing started.
So the question is...
Could a LSWC be made in two parts?
- The base, made from hard-cast lead would have a hollow opening about 75% of its length. This hollow opening would be hex-shaped or have a spline shape (like a Torx bolt).
- The HP nose would be swaged from lead rod of an appropriate hardness (but still soft enough to expand). The shape, in profile, would be the nose & shoulder of a LSWC and below the shoulder would be a "tail" sized for the opening in the base.
- Assembly would involve pressing the softer lead into the base, perhaps with some kind of bonding agent. A final sizing operation would be necessary to ensure consistent results.
This would give you a LSWC capable of being driven faster than a swaged bullet, but the HP nose would expand like a swaged bullet. Obviously separation of the two pieces needs to be avoided.
Other than it'd be more expensive than a standard LSWC, the performance could be excellent for self-defense ammo.
Is this idea all wet? Too goofy? Pie in the sky? Anyone know if it's ever been tried?