Leopold vS Trijicon

M

meanoldman

New member
Anyone used both? aCOG versus the tactical CQ 1-3 power scope. for use on an aR type rifle. The variable setting on the Leopold is attractive to me.

Thanks,
david
 
D

dwatts47

New member
I've used both....
. I'll give you that adjustable power magnification could be one up for the leophold. both are top notch. I also like that the Leophold is lower profile.

FWIW, I Use the Aimpoint exclusively my on AR's now.
 
Z

Zak Smith

New member
CQT has narrow field of view and not BDC reticle features. Its illumination is not bright enough to enable the "BAC" effect.

The TA11 is a better practical optic than the TA31 because the longer eye relief and larger exit pupil enable faster sight picture acquisition, and better tracking while on the move.
 
M

meanoldman

New member
Ok I like the TA11. I have a couple of stupid questions. The BDC-based on a specific round? 55 grain?? adjustable at all? IF I switched my upper to a 6.8 how much would it be off??

Ken right now I have an EOTech on it-that I bought from you- let me save my pennies for a couple of months and I will call you. better yet use one as a demo for a couple of months. :D

David
 
Z

Zak Smith

New member
The 308 model TA11 will be a better match for 6.8SPC or 75-77gr 223/556. However, differences in barrel length and station altitude will cause divergence from the BDC-- bottom line, you'll have to shoot it and figure out how it matches your gun & load.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top