Shane Tuttle
Staff
I read this from a post in another thread and I got me to thinking....
I understood in the past that lead bullets were inherently more accurate. But the reason why I was told was they filled the rifling of the barrel moreso than a copper jacketed bullet. It provided a better sealing from spent gases, therefore making the most out of the propellent.
This is what was told to me years ago as a kid just starting out in the firearms world. I tend to think this is only half-truths. What is the straight story?
My other question: Isn't today's jacketed bullets at least just as accurate, if not, more? I think bullet design alone has come a long way since the '60's.
Surely, the "lead is more accurate" genre is coming to a close....or is it?
I understood in the past that lead bullets were inherently more accurate. But the reason why I was told was they filled the rifling of the barrel moreso than a copper jacketed bullet. It provided a better sealing from spent gases, therefore making the most out of the propellent.
This is what was told to me years ago as a kid just starting out in the firearms world. I tend to think this is only half-truths. What is the straight story?
My other question: Isn't today's jacketed bullets at least just as accurate, if not, more? I think bullet design alone has come a long way since the '60's.
Surely, the "lead is more accurate" genre is coming to a close....or is it?