I may take a fair number of stray rounds for this, but here goes.
Guys, let not forget what started this whole thing - an innocent man was wrongly shot 19 times. As a result, he died.
Now it appears that a jury, having heard all the evidence has concluded that the officers involved did not act with criminal or reckless intent. Given that they heard all the evidence and I did not, I respect their verdict. On the other hand that jury verdict does not mean that the shooting was, in fact, justified or that the officers who did the shooting were'nt negligent in their actions. Thus while the officers are not criminally liable, they may well be civily and professionally liable - that remains to be seen.
Whatever the outcome I think our first sympathies should go to the family of the man who was killed. While we should be gratefull to the NY Jury for their service and gratified to see the system work, all in all there is little in this whole sad tragedy to pleased with.
Just my gut reaction.
------------------
"If a man neglects to enforce his rights, he cannot complain if, after a while, the law follows his example. . ." - Oliver Wendell Holmes