RAE---
Thanks for the site URL. That's what concerned me. Actually, the Hogdon's website lists max for the 230 jacketed bullet at a little lighter than my other references--
Hogdon's says 6.0 gr is MAX with the 230.
NOTE TO ALL:
Neither The Firing Line, the owner, the administrators, moderators nor other members accept any responsibility for use or aftereffects of any load above those published in recognized Handloading/Reloading information sources.
USE SUCH LOADS AT YOUR OWN RISK!
Look, friends, I myself use certain loads which are above published maximums. They were worked up years ago, either from old data or in the absence of published data for a given load combination. BUT YOU SELDOM SEE THOSE LOADS POSTED ON TFL. On the rare occasions I mention them--Such as one for .44 Special with 240 bullets and Unique powder a few months ago-- I always post proper cautions.
If you want to share with us some whiz-bang load, you MUST include proper cautions, to the effect that the data is beyond published data, and that it is used at one's own risk. Post this in BOLD, and I think we are on fairly firm ground.
These are the local game rules, on this H&R forum. It is the only way I feel comfortable moderating this forum. Apparently Rich Lucibella and the Administrators agree with this stance.
Please note--I am not getting onto ANYONE about this. It is some time since the subject has arisen. The only member with whom there was ever a problem in this regard has long departed. This is a general caution and you will probably see this cautionary note elsewhere later.
I feel fortunate in having the opportunity to moderate this forum. The participants are NICE people, always ready to share information and help out other shooters. H&R is not an area where people get fighting mad like in some other fora. I am honored to have the job, and I have learned a lot from the other members.
Thanks, all.
Johnny Guest
Moderator,
TFL H&R Forum
MOLON LABE!