There has never been, and never will be, a viable way to wage "war" on "terror".
War is something one country wages against another country, as a result of diplomatic solutions to conflicts failing. War ends when both warring nations agree to stop fighting, and resume diplomatic efforts to resolve differences.
Yes, there are "terrorists", and yes, there IS a "terrorist threat". There are evil people in the world who do evil things. When does this terrorist threat end? Do we negotiate with the terrorists for their surrender? I think not. Do we wage war on every nation that has terrorists living within it's borders? We would have to invade all of Europe, most of Africa and Asia, and many parts of South and Central America. Not to mention all the Pacific Islands.
So when does the terrorist threat end? When all the terrorists are dead? I think the Imams would have no problem creating more, since the madras' are the only schools most of the Muslim children know, and the Imams are their only sources of information. Some are of the opinion that we should wage war against the entire Muslim religion, since most of our attackers are Muslims. Would it be ethical for America to promote genocide of every Muslim in the world? I think not. We're the good guys. We just don't do things like that.
So... how far has this "war on terror" gotten us? Are we safer now? Are our borders more secure? Are the cargo containers being searched? I think not.
Instead of waging an imaginary war on terror, losing real lives, and spending real money, we should be waging a real war, against real terrorists. We should have never invaded a country that had NO terrorist training camps (and actually had as many differences with the hard-core religious fanatics as we have). Now that we have, we should be moving with all haste to extricate ourselves from out position as inefficient nation-builders, as safely as possible. We should redouble our efforts to find the real terrorists, while NOT treating our Constitution as "just another damned paper".
I, for one, wouldn't mind spending the billions we've pissed away in Iraq, if it actually made us safer. I don't even care if every company earning those billions is hand-picked by Bush himself, with no competitive bidding whatsoever... as long as the end result makes for safer Americans.
My opinion, though, is that our efforts are primarily aimed at transferring hard-earned tax money from our Treasury to those non-bidding corporations that consistently thumb their noses at contracted duties, put our soldiers at risk, and avoid paying their own taxes through Caymen Island shell corporations. As such, I deem Bush's "War on Terror" an abject failure for all Americans.
But hey.... what do I know?