No question that anyone who contacts an elected rep is recorded as a "gun nut" or "crackpot" or worse...
If you care to visit www.emord.com/lawsuits and find the "Pearson" decision, it is good for a laugh and more.
In this decision a 3 judge panel on the Fed Appeals court "beat up" the Clinton people pretty good. And it is about health... Now who is against health (you don't want to know-- the drug companies).
O.K. You contact your elected reps and ask them what they are doing about this situation, never hurts to quote the court, most of them are lawyers and get real squirrelly, "abuse of power" etc... And ask them to report to you and oppose this government agency run amuck...
Then they have to take you out of the one catagory [GUN NUT/CRACKPOT] and refile you into a bigger catagory "concerned citizen who is at times a gunnut/crackpot..." Not hard to do with computers, AND your credibility with the other issues --you really think any congresspersons want to be unhealthy?-- that credibility rubs off on all issues, even gun related... good luck.
If you care to visit www.emord.com/lawsuits and find the "Pearson" decision, it is good for a laugh and more.
In this decision a 3 judge panel on the Fed Appeals court "beat up" the Clinton people pretty good. And it is about health... Now who is against health (you don't want to know-- the drug companies).
O.K. You contact your elected reps and ask them what they are doing about this situation, never hurts to quote the court, most of them are lawyers and get real squirrelly, "abuse of power" etc... And ask them to report to you and oppose this government agency run amuck...
Then they have to take you out of the one catagory [GUN NUT/CRACKPOT] and refile you into a bigger catagory "concerned citizen who is at times a gunnut/crackpot..." Not hard to do with computers, AND your credibility with the other issues --you really think any congresspersons want to be unhealthy?-- that credibility rubs off on all issues, even gun related... good luck.