I know, I know, it's still California

WIN71

New member
But at least Shasta County and the Record Searchlight "can see the light"

Home › Opinion › Editorials
Permit-holding gun owners don’t threaten parks
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Our view: The law-abiding folks with concealedcarry permits are not going to spark a crime wave at the camp grounds.

Nobody could expect gun-control advocates to like rules that make it easier to carry concealed weapons. It's just not in their DNA.
But the reaction by some opponents of a U.S. Interior Department rule allowing concealed-weapons permit holders to carry in national parks is just out of touch with reality.
The Brady Campaign, which is suing to block the rule, said it would "jeopardize the safety of park visitors." Sen. Dianne Feinstein wrote in a an Op-Ed that "park visitors expect a safe and enjoyable experience - not loaded guns and stray bullets."
Nobody wants to see shootouts over campsites at Manzanita Lake, but is there any evidence that permit holders are likely to engage in such dangerous activity? By definition, they're law-abiding citizens who've paid fees and subjected themselves to fingerprinting and background checks.
Shasta County is a gun-friendly place, where about 2,500 residents hold active concealed-weapon permits from the Sheriff's Department - a very high number, by California standards, for the size of the county. Even still, Sheriff Tom Bosenko said Friday that he couldn't recall a single gun-related crime by a permit holder in over 30 years. "We issue them to responsible people," he said.
The people to worry about are the ones who carry concealed weapons without a permit, whatever the law says. And frankly, park rangers don't search cars at the entrance stations. They don't stop and frisk backpackers. Compliance with the law is largely on the honor system. Parks are as safe as they are mainly because crooks don't like camping.
Hikers have little reason to pack a firearm in Lassen. And, heck, who wants the extra weight?
But if they're inclined to do so, amply vetted concealed weapons permit holders are the last people we need to fear.
Our view: The law-abiding folks with concealed-carry permits are not going to spark a crime wave at the campgrounds.
 

BikerRN

New member
I wish my local communist rag, that calls itself a "newspaper" would be so enlightened.

I get the socialist manifesto in mine. :barf:

Biker
 

Bud Helms

Senior Member
WIN71, you need to stick a [/quote] in there somewhere, so we know where the quote stops. Also a clickable link would be nice. At least the url, please.
 

JWT

New member
Rather positive editorial comment for a newspaper and even more amazing one from California. The Brady Bunch and Senators responses, on the other hand, are about what one would expect.
 

BuckHammer

New member
I'm not familiar with that park, but are bears a potential problem there? If so, concealed weapons could make park visitors much safer. Someone should tell that to the liberals.
 

WIN71

New member
Last edited:

jhansman

New member
It is worth noting that the majority of the counties in Calif. are rural and contain many, many pro-gun folks. It is the actions of the idiots in Sacramento that have given the state it's black eye, and the failure of the citizens to oust them.
Glad to hear Shasta county sees more clearly.
 

dm1333

New member
It is worth noting that the majority of the counties in Calif. are rural and contain many, many pro-gun folks. It is the actions of the idiots in Sacramento that have given the state it's black eye, and the failure of the citizens to oust them.
Glad to hear Shasta county sees more clearly.

The op ed did not surprise me at all. I spent 4 years in Fort Bragg, in Mendocino County, and am going back next summer. The DA was very pro gun and on record stating that everybody who applied for a CCW and was eligible was going to get a permit. This from a county known for hippies, pot plantations and liberal attitudes.

edit: like Dianne Feinstein has spent any time outdoors in a National Park!
 
Top