Shane Tuttle
Staff
I'm in the middle of reloading for my pistols and it was time to move over to another powder I like.
HS6 for .45ACP cartridge. I had a massive amount loaded for my guns and it's been a while since I cranked out HS6 for it.
My labels on my ammo boxes state:
HS6 @ 7.4gr. OAL @ 1.230"
Hornady 230gr. XTP JHP
The purpose for the loads is strictly long session range duty. This load has worked great in both my Springer 5in. 1911 and XD45ACP Service model (4in). No problems feeding or cycling. I thought I'd play with the load a bit for giggles and grins.
So, I dug up the info I printed out last year from Hodgdon's site. They only have FMJ @ 1.200" rated at 8.0gr min.-8.2gr max. Isn't this a typo? They even have a larger spread for lead bullets than the stated FMJ. The only small spread I saw was for their 200gr. LSWC.
Lyman's 48th ed. doesn't have a 230gr FMJ recipe.
Speer #14 has their 230gr JHP recipe at 7.2-8.0gr @1.200. It's spread was close in line with the 10% reduced-from-max. This is the information I trusted ultimately for loading my previous batch.
I was going to set up for 7.5gr and start loading in mass quantities, but was wondering if Hodgdon specifically stated the small spread for their min/max for a reason. I have followed the general rule of loading down 10% from max loads using more than one source of data. However, I've been told this is only a general rule of thumb because excessively low charges could be just as dangerous. I wanted to get further clarification from others that have more experience or have better first hand knowledge of these issues before starting up.
So, after my thesis, to sum up:
1. Is Hodgdon's load data I presented a typo or should I be using at least 8.0gr. of HS6?
2. Will using a reduced load at, say, 7.5gr, be a dangerous route?
3. Are there combinations of bullet weight/type, primer, and powder that's dangerous to reduce? Why?
Thanks for the help.
HS6 for .45ACP cartridge. I had a massive amount loaded for my guns and it's been a while since I cranked out HS6 for it.
My labels on my ammo boxes state:
HS6 @ 7.4gr. OAL @ 1.230"
Hornady 230gr. XTP JHP
The purpose for the loads is strictly long session range duty. This load has worked great in both my Springer 5in. 1911 and XD45ACP Service model (4in). No problems feeding or cycling. I thought I'd play with the load a bit for giggles and grins.
So, I dug up the info I printed out last year from Hodgdon's site. They only have FMJ @ 1.200" rated at 8.0gr min.-8.2gr max. Isn't this a typo? They even have a larger spread for lead bullets than the stated FMJ. The only small spread I saw was for their 200gr. LSWC.
Lyman's 48th ed. doesn't have a 230gr FMJ recipe.
Speer #14 has their 230gr JHP recipe at 7.2-8.0gr @1.200. It's spread was close in line with the 10% reduced-from-max. This is the information I trusted ultimately for loading my previous batch.
I was going to set up for 7.5gr and start loading in mass quantities, but was wondering if Hodgdon specifically stated the small spread for their min/max for a reason. I have followed the general rule of loading down 10% from max loads using more than one source of data. However, I've been told this is only a general rule of thumb because excessively low charges could be just as dangerous. I wanted to get further clarification from others that have more experience or have better first hand knowledge of these issues before starting up.
So, after my thesis, to sum up:
1. Is Hodgdon's load data I presented a typo or should I be using at least 8.0gr. of HS6?
2. Will using a reduced load at, say, 7.5gr, be a dangerous route?
3. Are there combinations of bullet weight/type, primer, and powder that's dangerous to reduce? Why?
Thanks for the help.
Last edited: