45_Shooter
New member
Has anyone ever tried working up a 180 or 200 grain load for a .357 snub?
At first glance it seems silly, but when you consider that .357's use relatively slow powder, and heavy bullets spend more time in the barrel than lighter ones enabling more time for powder to burn in short barrels, it actually seems like the heavier bullets would be more efficient than the more popular lighter ones.
It would also seem that the lower velocity of the heavy bullets would reduce the ridiculously loud report and muzzle flash endemic to small snubs.
I forget the thread, but someone around here not long ago posted velocity loss of .45 ACP's from 3" barrels to 5" barrels, and the heavier 230's experienced significantly less velocity loss than the lighter ones.
Just a thought since the little pocket boomers seem to be rising in popularity these days......wish I still had a .357 snub to experiment with!
At first glance it seems silly, but when you consider that .357's use relatively slow powder, and heavy bullets spend more time in the barrel than lighter ones enabling more time for powder to burn in short barrels, it actually seems like the heavier bullets would be more efficient than the more popular lighter ones.
It would also seem that the lower velocity of the heavy bullets would reduce the ridiculously loud report and muzzle flash endemic to small snubs.
I forget the thread, but someone around here not long ago posted velocity loss of .45 ACP's from 3" barrels to 5" barrels, and the heavier 230's experienced significantly less velocity loss than the lighter ones.
Just a thought since the little pocket boomers seem to be rising in popularity these days......wish I still had a .357 snub to experiment with!