Have Leupold's improved?

garryc

New member
Many years ago I had two Leupold Tactical scopes fail on me. In both cases the reticles broke. The first one I know I smacked the top of a wall with the butt of the rifle. How the second one happened I do not know. Both during maneuvers for my department. Both times the rifle was slung across my back.

That was 16-17 years ago, has Leupold improved that design since then?
 

jimbob86

Moderator
As far as I know, Leuold has had a pretty good no questions asked warranty .... what's better than that?
 

AllenJ

New member
That is the first time I've ever heard of that happening to a Leupold and I've been using them for over 30 years. They have an outstanding record of not failing in the worst of conditions and I've never had any issues and don't know anyone who has. Have they improved? In my opinion yes, they are more clear with better coatings but I do not know if they have changed anything other than that.
 
I have no idea how old my Leupold scopes are, I've sent two back for repair, to my recollection they didn't cost me anything. Tough & durable, they hold their zero, when ever I'm ready they are ready. THEY ARE A BARGIN, in a world that very few things last forever they are pretty darn close.. William
 

JimDandy

New member
Let's turn the question around.

Has your department quit bashing their scopes against walls hard enough to break them no matter what brand they are?

I haven't seen any scope maker use "alternative to side handle batons" in their advertising plan.

How much better than fixing it for free when you broke it doing something you shouldn't have to it do you want Leupold to improve to?
 

sirgilligan

New member
Well, before the dog pile gets too deep I would like to say that is hard to answer. No one notices that their scope didn't break when they bumped their rifle, they only notice it if it did break.

Does anyone know if someone has rated scopes for their toughness? If so, how does Leupold rate? What is the toughest scope out there?

By the way, which model Leupold broke?
 

HiBC

New member
How long ago?
Was it a milDot?

Long ago when a milDot was pretty special(I could be wrong) I think Premier Reticle retro'd the MilDots into the Leupold scopes,and I think the dots were made by flattening the wire reticle.

Given Leupold is now supplying reticles like the Varmint Hunter,etc,I suspect they may be etched glass.That said,the Premier Reticles served Military snipers well,and this is the first I have heard a complaint of Leupold reticle failure,Premier or otherwise.


Also,were the rings lapped?Poor ring alignment distorts the scope tube,and can break about anything.IMO,its the first place to look when a quality scope has problems

Mounting a scope is not always straightforward "screw it on"
 
Last edited:

Coppershot

New member
I paid my own money for my Leopold scopes so I handle the rifles / handguns on which they sit pretty carefully. I am surprised you do not know how the second one broke. Was someone other than you handling the rifle?
 

603Country

New member
Like AllenJ, I've hunted hard through the decades and I've never had a Leupold break. I've mistreated them, but they keep taking the punishment. Unlike Leupold, I've had Weaver, Tasco, Redfield, and Nikon Monarch fail me. I don't buy them any more. I do also have a couple of Burris and one Vortex Viper and no problems from them so far.

From chats on this forum and others, I've come to think that the scopes that are breaking are mostly the turret types that get a good bit of cranking this way and that. And, of course, the cheap scopes will tend to break or mistrack. And that brings up the word "cheap". We all have different thoughts on what a cheap price is. To some, cheaper than a Nightforce is cheap. To me, I suppose less than $100 would be cheap - like a advertised 6-24 tactical scope for $69.95. Do we really think that scope would hold up? Nah. But...back in the day I had a 6-24 Tasco on my 220 Swift and it lasted years till I upgraded.

So now I'm rambling...forgive me.
 
Top