Gollee... why didn't we think of this??

The Plainsman

New member
Prisoners may get "go straight" contracts

By Astrid Zweynert

LONDON (Reuters) - Prisoners leaving jail could be asked to sign "going straight" contracts to stop them committing more crimes, according to a new government report.

The idea would be to offer them a range of benefits on their release, such as housing credits, to tackle chronically high rates of re-offending. Ex-prisoners commit nearly one fifth of all crime at a cost of 11 billion pounds annually.

Opposition politicians denounced the proposals, put forward on Monday by the Social Exclusion Unit (SEU), as a kneejerk reaction.

"If this is (the government's) idea for a serious rehabilitative programme, they need to think again," said Oliver Letwin, the Conservative Party's home affairs spokesman.

"Getting people out of the cycle of crime will involve far more than just paying their rent," he said.

Official data in the report showed jail sentences have not succeeded in turning offenders away from crime, posing a challenge to Prime Minister Tony Blair's pledge to tackle the "revolving door syndrome" in the criminal justice system.

Re-offending accounts for an estimated one million crimes a year in Britain, or 18 percent of recorded crime.

The problem is most acute among male prisoners, with 72 percent of 18-20 year olds re-convicted within two years ofleaving prison and 47 percent receiving another jail sentence.

The SEU proposed prisoners should sign contracts on sentencing, promising future good behaviour in return for support and a range of benefits on their release.

The SEU, set up by Blair to tackle the growth of an underclass, said unemployment and homelessness were the root causes of re-offending, with many prisoners having experienced a lifetime of social exclusion.

One solution to combat homelessness would be to enable more prisoners to claim housing benefit to allow them to keep their homes while they are in jail, the report said.

"What this is really about is reducing re-offending, because you get too many cases of prisoners coming out of prison having served the sentence and then going straight back and committing crime," Cabinet Office Minister Barbara Roche said.

The report contained no details of specific cash amounts, prompting claims from campaigners that ministers were backtracking on plans for cash handouts.

Leaked details from early drafts of the report showed that the government intended to give prisoners 100 pounds on release and pay their rent for six months, according to media reports.

Mark Leech, founder of reform charity Unlock, said the ruling Labour Party's 1997 promise to be tough on the causes of crime meant nothing without figures.

"If they are going to help ex-offenders...let's have the figures, let's see what we're looking at, let's put the proposals on the table and let's see a government with the courage to deliver," he told the BBC.

Paul Cavadino, from the National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders, said ex-offenders could not claim benefits until two weeks after their release.

"That greatly increases the chances they will go back to crime quickly because they have no money," said Cavadino.
 

Christopher II

New member
Interesting. So can the average joe-on-the-street sign one of these contracts and get free stuff, too? No? You have to commit a crime to be eligible? Wait a sec, if a criminal commits a crime doesn't he normally return to prison upon getting caught? Why would you need a contract in that case?

Wow. My head feels funny...

- Chris
 

Zundfolge

New member
Opposition politicians denounced the proposals, put forward on Monday by the Social Exclusion Unit (SEU), as a kneejerk reaction.
Gotta love that fair and unbiased British "journalism" :rolleyes:
 

Don Gwinn

Staff Emeritus
Zundfolge, I believe the meaning of that phrase could be better expressed as "Opposition politicians denounced the measure, calling it a 'kneejerk reaction.'" ;)
 

spacemanspiff

New member
i dunno. since all people are really inherently 'good', and its only the influence of outside sources that causes 'bad' behavior, i can see how this setup might be able to work. a person says they will do something or won't do something, and hey, all people are trustworthy, right? {sarcasm off}
 

bastiat

New member
Why not just offer bribes for people not to commit crimes in the first place? Then we can skip jail.

Oh wait, they already do that. It's called 'welfare', I believe.
 

db4

New member
What a good idea! This way the govment can concentrate on what it does best-armed robbery-and subsidize the other criminals directly, without all the bother and expence of a justice system, prisons, police...eliminating all those middlemen should do wonders for efficiency.
 

Tamara

Moderator Emeritus
Let me get this straight: knock over a convenience store and they offer you cookies and milk to promise never to do it again; never knock over a convenience store, and get nothing, since you are merely abiding by the social contract in the first place.

Okay. Yeah. That makes sense... :rolleyes:
 

MuzzleBlast

New member
Prisoners leaving jail could be asked to sign "going straight" contracts to stop them committing more crimes, according to a new government report.
This is an honest-to-god Reuters story? Are you sure it didn't come from The Onion?
 

TexasVet

New member
Britain is toast. It is way to late to ever recover freedom (and apparently, legislative intelligence) over there.:barf:
 
Top