Erich, That is alright I am obtuse.
Most people on the Detroit area usually in the winter wear a leather coat for wind resistance, and if they are going to be out for a while, a t-shirt, shirt, and a hooded sweatshirt. Hollowpoint expansion is not guranteed under the best conditions, maybe the efmj with the hp removed will penetrate and give some expansion, I would love to see ballistic testing comparing them with leo sxt's, with leather covering the gelatin. For people who like number the Sectional density, which is a calculation of weight by bullet frontal area I believe, and higher is better, lists a 230gr .45 with .161 the same as a .40 at 180 grains. the .40 at 165 is .147, the .45 is .140 at 200. With my wife carrying a .40 with LEO 165's at 1140 fps, and 474 ft-lbs if energy, it is hard to argue with those numbers. The .40 efmj at 135 grains and only 1200 fps gives me pause, at 1300 fps I would be happier. I like it that the bullet companies are trying new things, I hope it isn't like the auto companies old strategy of make it, and let the public test it. I did computer modeling of auto parts for crash testing. A being symetrical would be easy to model model 1/6 or 1/8 of the round,depending if there are cuts around the HP or other structures, and rotate and copy. I never knew if Nastran was very NVH or crash testing, but it gives you an idea about bullet design. Prototype 100,000 rounds and shoot it in the field. The japanese used to tune there engines on the Dyno for max touque and HP, and wondered why the german who did final tuning on the track always outperformed them. Thank you for listening to me put you to sleep.