Got a question for y'all..
Given the choice between two sets of controls on a firearm -- one that's sleek and close in to the weapon, and another that juts out all over, but is easier to manipulate, which do you prefer?
For example -- on a FAL type rifle -- would you prefer a fixed handle attatched to the bolt, that reciprocates with it, or the fold-away, non-reciprocating type?
1911 -- extended thumb safety? or the little gov't type?
Basically -- which design theory is better, under what circumstances? I'm thinking primarily EvilBlackRifle type tools in particular, but I'm curious what y'all think about any application.
From my admittedly largely inexperienced viewpoint, it seems that (within reason) the bigger and simpler the controls, the better -- less to fumble on during stress. Sometimes, a little better leverage to. Jah? Or no?
-K
Given the choice between two sets of controls on a firearm -- one that's sleek and close in to the weapon, and another that juts out all over, but is easier to manipulate, which do you prefer?
For example -- on a FAL type rifle -- would you prefer a fixed handle attatched to the bolt, that reciprocates with it, or the fold-away, non-reciprocating type?
1911 -- extended thumb safety? or the little gov't type?
Basically -- which design theory is better, under what circumstances? I'm thinking primarily EvilBlackRifle type tools in particular, but I'm curious what y'all think about any application.
From my admittedly largely inexperienced viewpoint, it seems that (within reason) the bigger and simpler the controls, the better -- less to fumble on during stress. Sometimes, a little better leverage to. Jah? Or no?
-K