Executive Order 13083 replaced with new one

[DC]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_bresnahan/19990806_xex_executive_or.shtml

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>By David M. Bresnahan
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- There's good news and bad
news from the White House. The good news is that
Executive Order 13083 has been officially revoked, but
the bad news is that a new executive order on
Federalism has replaced it.

Governors, mayors, and citizens from all political parties
rallied together in an effort to abolish EO 13083 when it
was signed in May 1998. <a href=http://www.worldnetdaily.com/exclusiv/980626.ex.natl.id.card.html>WorldNetDaily first broke the
news of what initially appeared to be a non-threatening
document.</a> Elected officials were not aware of EO
13083 until WorldNetDaily asked for comments, but
they soon went to work to stop it.

Shortly after the nation's governors voted in the National
Governor's Association convention in opposition to the
order, President Clinton signed EO 13095 which
suspended 13083. Many expressed concern that it was
only suspended and not revoked.

The uprising of governors, who were joined by the
nation's mayors, was over the clever wording used by
President Clinton in EO 13083. Gov. Mike Leavitt,
R-Utah, protested loudly and claimed that EO 13083
did not clarify previous federalism executive orders -- it
destroyed them.

"This order (EO 13083) represents a 180-degree turn
from all previous federalism aimed to restrain federal
action over states," said Leavitt in disagreement with the
Clinton fact sheet issued at the time. "The current
version of this new order is written to justify federal
supremacy," he stated last year..........(more) [/quote]

------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes"

 

[Joe Portale]

Citizen, do you have a travel permit to be here?

Orwell was right, he just got the year wrong.

------------------
Joe Portale
Sonoran Sidewinder
Tucson, Arizona territory

 

[Ivan8883]

DC , on the Alex Jones show today it was mentioned that Big Comrades new executive order on Federal powers in the states has no number and the number has not been given out. Congress has only thiry days to stop it. Guess what? I bet our King is so arrogant he wont give a number to it. I wonder if this is tied into rumors of possible martial law in September. Big comrade needs a executive order like the one that failed so he can completly run the states like he runs Congress. Cant have martial law without all the bases covered.

 

[DC]

Ivan...
Yep, I have no doubts he'll try a weasel move. The thing we have to do is get on our reps, and definately keep on eye on the candidates and relationship with Clinton and his backers.

------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes"

 

[Ivan8883]

DC, the problem for many of us IS our reps in Congress. These people,and my rep is a so called conservative, give us the thousand yard stare when we talk about serious subjects such as Clintons many power grabs with the scores of executive orders already law and more on the way. Congress has become irrelevent and lets Bill run the country by fiat. Dont get me wrong . Other Presidents have end runned Congress ,but this guy has taken Kingly rule to a new high. Are these Congressmen and women that stupid or are they just happy to take the money and run with it?