Went to the range today and brought along 4 pistols (Kel-Tec P32, Khar P9, Makarov 9X18 and a CZ52). Here is what happened:
P32 - 200 rds with at least 1 stove pipe or fail to extract on every magazine (used 2 different mags). Ok, so it is the first 200 and there needs to be some break-in time. Maybe I need to do the "fluff and buff" .
Khar P9 - 250 rds with no failures but it previously took about 1000 rds and 1 trip to back to the factory to work out the issues
.
EG Makarov - 200 rds with no failures. In fact I have fired over 1500 rds in this pistol without any hiccups. It just keeps running and running and running.....
CZ52 - 200 rds today and about 600 altogether. Not a single problem today or since the day I bought it. Plus I still can't get the grin off of my face from shooting that beautiful (if in a strange way) piece of communist workmanship . Not to mention all the attention it draws and the requests to shoot it.
Has anyone else had a similar experience with these Eastern Bloc pistols? I'm thinking that I might need to take look at the Tokarev or maybe a CZ83. Looking for suggestions!
BTW- Individually the Mak and the CZ cost less than the Kel-Tec and when combined they are still less than the P9. Inexpensive, reliable, accurate and extremely fun - not bad for some 50+ year old designs.
P32 - 200 rds with at least 1 stove pipe or fail to extract on every magazine (used 2 different mags). Ok, so it is the first 200 and there needs to be some break-in time. Maybe I need to do the "fluff and buff" .
Khar P9 - 250 rds with no failures but it previously took about 1000 rds and 1 trip to back to the factory to work out the issues
.
EG Makarov - 200 rds with no failures. In fact I have fired over 1500 rds in this pistol without any hiccups. It just keeps running and running and running.....
CZ52 - 200 rds today and about 600 altogether. Not a single problem today or since the day I bought it. Plus I still can't get the grin off of my face from shooting that beautiful (if in a strange way) piece of communist workmanship . Not to mention all the attention it draws and the requests to shoot it.
Has anyone else had a similar experience with these Eastern Bloc pistols? I'm thinking that I might need to take look at the Tokarev or maybe a CZ83. Looking for suggestions!
BTW- Individually the Mak and the CZ cost less than the Kel-Tec and when combined they are still less than the P9. Inexpensive, reliable, accurate and extremely fun - not bad for some 50+ year old designs.