A person I work with has made the claim that all paint and gun powder manufacturers place an extremely small tagant into their products so the manufacturers of the powders or paint can be indentified by microscope. She is a big forensics freak and she has taken a couple of classes. I told her, "I don't think so." One, why do the powder manufacturers care whether someone can tell whether it is their powder or not? Two, why would they endure the extra cost? Three, why hasn't it been more widely known to us shooters?
What I think she is getting confused is that the different properties of IMR vs. Winchester vs. Accurate Arms and on and on enable a forensics scientist to be able to identify the different powers. They can probably even do this from burnt and used powder. Hower, I just don't see the powder companies doing this for ID purposes. I don't think the shooting public would tolerate it. I mean I don't personally care. Big deal, someone knows what kind of powder was used. Usually there is much bigger evidence to convinct people of a crime than powder residue leading to a powder manufacturer and lo and behold, the guy has some Unique in his garage!!!
I think I might even shoot off an e-mail to a few of the manufacturers.
What I think she is getting confused is that the different properties of IMR vs. Winchester vs. Accurate Arms and on and on enable a forensics scientist to be able to identify the different powers. They can probably even do this from burnt and used powder. Hower, I just don't see the powder companies doing this for ID purposes. I don't think the shooting public would tolerate it. I mean I don't personally care. Big deal, someone knows what kind of powder was used. Usually there is much bigger evidence to convinct people of a crime than powder residue leading to a powder manufacturer and lo and behold, the guy has some Unique in his garage!!!
I think I might even shoot off an e-mail to a few of the manufacturers.