DeLay gives the Democrats what they wanted

IZinterrogator

New member
A mug shot photo to use against him in political ads:

vert.delay.hcso.jpg


It's going to be tough to use that one against him, though. Good lighting, cheerful expression, nice tie...

Smiling DeLay turns himself in for booking

Thursday, October 20, 2005; Posted: 4:43 p.m. EDT (20:43 GMT)

(CNN) -- Rep. Tom DeLay, the former House majority leader who faces conspiracy and money laundering charges, turned himself in Thursday in Houston, one day after an arrest warrant was issued for him.

DeLay walked into the bonding department of the Harris County Sheriff's Office shortly after noon and was fingerprinted, photographed and released after posting $10,000 bond, sheriff's spokeswoman Lisa Martinez said.

DeLay's home District of Sugar Land borders Houston.

Outside the building, DeLay attorney Dick DeGuerin blasted prosecutor Ronnie Earle, accusing him of singling out the Texas Republican for political retribution and planning to use DeLay's mug shot in Democratic mailings.

"He's got what he wanted. There's no reason for this. It was pure retaliation on the part of Ronnie Earle," DeGuerin said, holding up DeLay's mug shot. "There he is. Take a good look at him."

He also said the defense team "will expose his prosecution for what he is."

In his mug shot, a smiling DeLay is wearing a coat and tie. The photograph doesn't have numbers below his face like many mug shots because the county no longer uses such a system, Martinez said.

The booking happened a day after a state court issued an arrest warrant for him, ahead of his first scheduled court appearance Friday in Austin.

DeLay was indicted October 3 and an arrest warrant was issued Wednesday.

On September 28, a grand jury indicted Delay and associates John Colyandro and Jim Ellis on a conspiracy charge on allegations they steered $190,000 in corporate donations to state legislative candidates in 2002 and disguised the source by sending the money through national Republican campaign committees. Texas law prohibits corporate donations to political campaigns.

DeLay has accused Austin prosecutor Ronnie Earle, the Travis County district attorney, of launching a partisan vendetta against him. He showed his frustration Wednesday, telling CNN, "We all know what this is about. The quicker it's over the better."

There was no immediate official comment from the congressman's lawyers. But in a written statement, Earle's office said, "We believe that Congressman DeLay should be treated like everyone else."

Jeffrey Toobin, senior legal analyst for CNN, said he didn't see the issuance of the arrest warrant necessarily as a personal attack. When a warrant is issued in Texas after an indictment, "it is usually, but not always, a formality," Toobin told CNN's Lou Dobbs.

However, in many white-collar cases, Toobin said, the defense attorney and the prosecutor work out a surrender time for the defendant without a warrant being issued.

"That's kind of the civilized way to do it," he said. But there is nothing civil about the conflict between Earle and DeLay, "And this arrest warrant is further proof of that," Toobin said.

In addition, said Toobin, the fingerprinting and mug shot also will be embarrassing.

DeLay already has subpoenaed Earle, claiming prosecutorial misconduct in the case, and a hearing will be held on the legitimacy of the prosecution. Earle issued a subpoena last week for DeLay's phone records.

Because of his felony indictment, House GOP rules required DeLay to step down as majority leader, the No. 2 position in the House hierarchy. He was replaced by Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Missouri.

After DeLay's defense raised questions about whether the conspiracy charge applied to the state election code back in 2002, Earle went to a second grand jury to instead seek a money-laundering charge against the three.

That grand jury refused to indict DeLay. But a third grand jury returned an indictment October 3, charging DeLay, Colyandro and Ellis with money-laundering and conspiracy.

Before DeLay's indictment on felony charges, according to DeLay's attorney, Dick DeGuerin, his client turned down an offer from the Texas prosecutor to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, which would have allowed him to remain as House majority leader.

The offer was revealed Monday in a letter from DeGuerin to Earle among a new batch of motions filed in the case. DeGuerin wrote that both Colyandro and Ellis have told prosecutors that DeLay "played no part in the transactions described in the indictment."

In motions filed Monday, DeGuerin requested a speedy trial and asked that DeLay be tried separately from Colyandro and Ellis because they want to pursue appeals of issues in the case that would delay the proceedings.

DeGuerin also filed motions to quash both of the criminal charges against DeLay on a laundry list of legal grounds.

Among the arguments raised by DeLay's defense was that the charges should have been brought in DeLay's home county rather than in Travis County, which includes the state capital, Austin.

In his letter to Earle, DeGuerin charged that Earle "contrived" to bring the indictment in Travis County because the district attorney in Fort Bend County "would reject the case."
 

danco

New member
It's going to be tough to use that one against him, though. Good lighting, cheerful expression, nice tie...
How's this: "It's obvious that Mr. DeLay has no respect for the law, and thinks that being charged with a felony is just a big joke." ;)

~Dan
 

MeekAndMild

New member
"It's obvious that Mr. DeLay has no respect for the law, and thinks that being charged with a felony is just a big joke."
The law under which he was charged came into effect the year after the alleged actions allegedly occurred. You might want to look up the US Constitution, Article I, Section 9 "No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."


In the end I think the joke will be on the prosecutor. This is obviously a political scam.
 

kjm

New member
No, the original charge was the one that wasn't against the law at the time. Then Ronnie Earl had to do some swift dancing to get the "conspiracy" charge for the same thing. DeLay will walk free and may never see the inside of a courtroom. This is blatant and I don't really even care for DeLay. Welcome to Texas politics Travis County style!

They'll get a change of venue from Travis to Williamson County and then the judge (any judge) will toss this case and probably reprimand Ronnie Earl. That's OK because Ronnie put some stink on DeLay and so now the voters in Travis County will vote him back into office for another term.

The dying gasps of the Democratic Party in Texas I suppose.
 

IZinterrogator

New member
You know, I can't believe that they let that clown Earle shop for a second grand jury for the conspiracy/money-laundering indictment. Did he even present any new evidence? When it comes to grand juries, without new evidence, double jeopardy should apply. I don't know if it actually does, I just think it should. Any lawyers with insight on that?
 

Waitone

New member
I for one don't think Delay has clean skirts. Time will tell if there is any justification for indicting him. If it turns out the whole thing is a political set up, I hope Texas spinelessrepublicans call out the dogs of civil litigation and hound the DA and his handlers into the ground. I am a simpleminded guy. My simple mind tells me the system of justice should never be used to commit crimes against citizens. I find it reprehensible that both parties engage in using the grand jury system as a cat's paw for something they otherwise would never be able to do.
 

IZinterrogator

New member
Time will tell if there is any justification for indicting him.
My money says that he had teams of lawyers that advised him how to do it in a way that skirted around the law without actually breaking it. He's a politician, they are always looking for ways to get what they want done despite the rules. But I don't think he would knowingly risk prison for $190,000 that went to someone else.
 

MK11

New member
Funny, the reaction to this, and no Scooter Libby thread. If they were Democrats, you'd be calling it high treason.

But hey, they're "conservatives," so it's all good, right? :barf:
 

1911SFOREVER

New member
Funny, your reaction to Scooter Libby's alleged transgressions and no thread from you on Sandy Burger. But he worked for Clinton so it's all cool, right?
 
Top