Was watching c-span about the new homeland security office and one of the "expert researchers" the panel was talking to was GARY HART (wierd huh)..
but one of the oddest bits was the discussion of WHO and HOW the defense was to be done.. the arguement was something like this..
The US Military can't be in charge b/c it violates the Posse Comitatus act., SO it falls back to the states to provide the defense, (this is thier language and I'm paraphrasing) since the Militia was 'organized in the early 20th century into national guard units, under the control of the state the national guard will be in charge of defense. Basically its a way to say The GUARD is the STATE'S army, NOT the FED's.
What bothers me is this "finding" would seem to suggest that WE AREN'T the militia, and this language can hurt our RKBA rights later. newt Gingrich supposedly had a hand in writing the chain of command and researching the history of defending american shores.
Any Thoughts? Am I being too paranoid? Please discuss.
but one of the oddest bits was the discussion of WHO and HOW the defense was to be done.. the arguement was something like this..
The US Military can't be in charge b/c it violates the Posse Comitatus act., SO it falls back to the states to provide the defense, (this is thier language and I'm paraphrasing) since the Militia was 'organized in the early 20th century into national guard units, under the control of the state the national guard will be in charge of defense. Basically its a way to say The GUARD is the STATE'S army, NOT the FED's.
What bothers me is this "finding" would seem to suggest that WE AREN'T the militia, and this language can hurt our RKBA rights later. newt Gingrich supposedly had a hand in writing the chain of command and researching the history of defending american shores.
Any Thoughts? Am I being too paranoid? Please discuss.