Chinese laser gun - beginning of the end of the projectile era?

simonrichter

New member
Obviously, the Chinese managed to pack a laser into a assault rifle sized weapon that is able to set clothing afire from 800m. I wonder whether we are actually witnessing the beginning of the end of the projectile weapon era? That would be bad news for us as civilian shooters, since we'll never get a hold on that technology and have to stick with what we have now which will become obsolete after weapons of that kind become the primary armament of military and LE...
 

Armorer-at-Law

New member
That would be bad news for us as civilian shooters, since we'll never get a hold on that technology and have to stick with what we have now which will become obsolete after weapons of that kind become the primary armament of military and LE...
And that's what the archers and spearchuckers said when gunpowder was invented.
 

MTT TL

New member
The technology has been out there since the 80s. The US Congress refused to fund such weapons. The military wanted to make them because they could strike enemies blind from a distance with the lasers and render them combat ineffective. Congress felt that blowing the enemy to bits conventionally was much more humane.
 

Glenn E. Meyer

New member
There was an international agreement to ban such, IIRC. The logic was that folks would rather lose a limb than be blinded. Blinding weapons were deployed to Somalia before the ban but not used. One incident had a person targeted but decided not to an instead blew him up.

One application was a high power laser scan across a battle field by a vehicle mounted weapon. Conventional optics of an opponent's scope would funnel the beam right into their fovea for destructive effects.

If this is true, someone else can research the details. I read it in an ophthalmology site years ago.
 

TXAZ

New member
Don't believe everything (anything?) you read from Chinese technology claims.

It sounds more like they want to put down protesters with banners at home.

Setting paper on fire at smaller distances is something you can do for $100
Burning laser

(Don't believe the 30Watt claim, but it will pop dark balloons and burn paper at 25 yards)
 

MTT TL

New member
If this is true, someone else can research the details. I read it in an ophthalmology site years ago.

I recall reading a print article about the same time frame with pretty much the same thing.


This laser rifle will absolutely blind people of it will burn through clothing at range. I doubt it is good for a 1000 shots. I can't get a Chinese made battery to last half as long as one made in the US by a reputable manufacturer. Don't even get me started on Chinese CR123s

Israel currently uses Iron Beam, which is a copy of a US Laser AD system that can destroy targets at listed ranges of over 12 Miles and fits on a truck. They have been testing and occasionally using laser weapons since the 90s.

Laser weapons are completely impractical for police use for a myriad of reasons. There are serious questions to their applicability in combat as an anti-personnel weapon due to the Clinton era treaty. Tactically they also host of problems if there were no paper. They make Rule 4 a nightmare for example.
 

DaleA

New member
Back in 2014 there was a story about a laser weapon being deployed on the USS Ponce which was out in the Persian Gulf.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-at-sea/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ea9073143096

The Ponce is now back in US waters and is destined to be scrapped. This story about the Ponce doesn't mention them ever using the laser in earnest.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...s-the-american-sea-base-sails-into-retirement

Personally I believe a lot of military folk would be reluctant to use a laser weapon because of the 'political' fallout they might encounter about being the first to use it. But I don't know if somebody, anybody, maybe from another country, has already used a laser weapon in combat. I'm cynical enough that if the commander of the Ponce HAD used the weapon there would be folk in our government that would claim "I was shocked, SHOCKED to find such weapons on our ships." (Apologies to the movie Casablanca.)
 

MTT TL

New member
The laser weapon system was moved to the Portland. They don't have anyone attacking them so yeah it isn't being used outside of tests.
 

cslinger

New member
7lb.....1000 shot......1000 meter.....man portable laser weapon. Ummmmhuuhh. Sure. I mean will the trained sharks of the Chinese Navy have these “frickin’” things mounted on them as well.

Color me skeptical.
 

Brian Pfleuger

Moderator Emeritus
Literally impossible with current technology... but could be a lie by implication.

Sure, the part the guy holds onto weighs 7lbs. Never mind that it’s hooked to a tank sized battery and laser generator behind him.
Think fireman holding a fire hose.
 

TXAZ

New member
It’s absolutely possible. You guys just don’t know how to interpret Chinese new technical specs ;)
(Divide every claim by 10, multiply the weight by 3, the volume by 5, and add 5 years to a be initial schedule)
While living in that neck of the world, they claimed our new military tech item couldn’t actually work in such a small package because theirs was much larger.
Really bad guess for them. :)
 

44 AMP

Staff
Jump the shark!! frikkin Sea Bass with phased plasma rifle in 40 watt range....:rolleyes::cool:

The 15mm calibre weapon weighs three kilos (6.6lb), about the same as an AK-47, and has a range of 800 metres, or half a mile, and could be mounted on cars, boats and planes...

The weapon’s lithium battery can apparently handle over 1,000 laser bursts that last around two seconds each.


there you go folks, AND they're only $15,000 a piece and ready for production now!! Get yours today!! order before midnight and not only will you get free shipping, but if you pay a small handling fee, we'll include a second laser unit free! Not sold in stores....

Line of sight, no drop, no wind drift, no recoil, silent (sort of) and INVISIBLE!! Ideal for covert ops!! or, is it??

It's not stated in the article that it's man portable, they mention mounting it on cars, boats, & airplanes....

unit weight of 3 kilos, no mention of self contained battery, so the battery COULD weigh 200 kilos. Mentions battery endurance (over 1,000 2 second shots) no mention of recharge cycle time. What if it takes 3 minutes to recharge between shots??

Mention of what the laser can do to targets, no mention of how long the beam has to be held steady in one spot to do that damage. 2 seconds??

Ok for structures and vehicles, much less so as an anti personnel weapon.

I don't see any good hunting use for a laser death ray, (shoot and roast your duck with the same shot??:eek:) and I'm doubtful of its defensive capabilities vs conventional firearms. Not that its can't kill, but can it STOP an attacker and do so in time?
And, what about overpenetration??? There's lots and lots of questions that need answering before we think about replacing firearms with lasers.

it does, however add a new wrinkle to the "mass vs energy" debate. :D
 

Glenn E. Meyer

New member

Andy Blozinski

New member
One of the news articles I read about this Chinese system mentioned a lot of claims were made and absolutely zero has been produced to back up that it's true.
 
Out gun? Well, they have more displacement. They are using a phased array radar. The USN has been using that since 1980. They have 112 VLS cells (The Ticonderoga laid down in 1980 and scrapped in 2004 had 122 cells).

If the Chinese hope to beat the U.S. Navy in blue water combat, they’ll need more than six modernized versions of a class we’ve been scrapping for the last 14 years.
 
Top