A used Rossi 92 (some years inexplicably called 65, usually .44 Mags) in .357 from their Interarms import era (80s through 2000/2001 or so). These have A. or Amadeus Rossi stamped on the barrel near the rear sight and caliber stamping. Then more recently Rossi-made '92 imports from EMF, Navy Arms and last (and least to me because of it's odd little lever safety) Legacy Sports International (LSI)--called "Pumas" (that moniker harkening back to some earlier Rossis so named. Some of these still have "Rossi" un the underside of the receiver, etc. Should be able to find a good clean used one of the former (Interarms era) in the $175-225 range, and the latter grouping $225-275. New ones go for as low as $360 or so (EMF) so you can still get into that fairly economically. Other calibers available (.44Mag, .44-40, etc.) but the .357 is the cheapest shooting.
These Rossis (and the original Winchester 92s (1892) from which their design sprang) are lighter, trimmer and handier to shoot IMO than the Marlin (or even Win 94) variants--especially for "plinking" duty, and have a very strong action designed for pistol calibers from the start. Like the pre AE win 94s, The Rossi however will not mount (decently) a scope--like AE Win 94s and Marlins can--but to me that misses much of the point/fun of a pistol caliber lever anyway. I won't argue the excellence of the Marlins (or Win 94s either), but going back to what appears to be a primary criteria (I assume ammo and gun), Eightball did say "cheap." These little carbines are also fast handling and fine in the reliability dept (having owned several), and reasonably accurate within their expected range.