I notice when reading gun rags that the carry modifications seem to help more in holstering a gun than actually making sure the gun doesn't snag when drawn.
I'm not speaking of things like "melt jobs" or rounded/beveled edges. But when you look at carry sights (Novak style), the rounding done on the muzzle and cylinder, etc. most are in the front, which doesn't keep anything from snagging on the draw.
It certainly makes for a more dramatic photo, but I question the utility. After all, if a gun snags on holstering, one just pulls it out again and just does it more carefully. If you have your finger on the trigger when holstering, it will still go off once finger meets holster.
Sure it is more difficult to make a curved rear surface on the rear sight and still present a nice square notch in the sight picture, but not impossible. It is the rear face that needs the gentle slope to keep from snagging, not the front.
Thought? What am I not seeing?
I'm not speaking of things like "melt jobs" or rounded/beveled edges. But when you look at carry sights (Novak style), the rounding done on the muzzle and cylinder, etc. most are in the front, which doesn't keep anything from snagging on the draw.
It certainly makes for a more dramatic photo, but I question the utility. After all, if a gun snags on holstering, one just pulls it out again and just does it more carefully. If you have your finger on the trigger when holstering, it will still go off once finger meets holster.
Sure it is more difficult to make a curved rear surface on the rear sight and still present a nice square notch in the sight picture, but not impossible. It is the rear face that needs the gentle slope to keep from snagging, not the front.
Thought? What am I not seeing?