Bullet weight AR 223

burrhead

New member
What bullet weight for a 10 1/2" 223 AR; heavy and slow or light and fast? I'm a reloader and thinking I'll split the baby and load some 65gr SGKs. These would be for social work.
 
I think I would go with the tried-and-true 55-grain. The .223 / 5.56x45 is, after all, just a .22 caliber firearm. The effectiveness of the round is derived foremost by the upsetting, or tumbling, of the bullet when it strikes and enters the target medium. Everything I have read tells me that a minimum velocity is needed for that upsetting to occur. Assuming a standard M16 barrel length, for example, the newer 62-grain bullets will reliably upset out to a shorter maximum effective range than the older 55-grain.

You're using a barrel of half the length of the M16, which will reduce the bullet's muzzle velocity and thus will reduce the distance out to which the bullet will reliably upset upon impact. Therefore, I would be very concerned about the distances within which you anticipate using this firearm for "social" purposes. How "social" do you want to be?
 

burrhead

New member
Got back from the range and chronoed my standard 55gr ball with 25gr of H335. MV is +/- 2700 which surprised me; I expected <2500. I'm going back Tuesday and really look at some different loads, especially in medium and lighter weights.

As to how social, I live very rural Texas/ Mexican border. I live in an Hispanic world, folks are kind, hard working, etc. I'm also a realist and there are some things that happen on all borders in the world that I don't want to be involved in. The only time I was actually shot was at a little over 100 yards according to law enforcement. I carry serious fire power in my truck but for a handy light gun around the house, 50-100 yards is probably good enough. BTW, I'm not a kid but staring 70 in the eye.
 
I assume your chrono velocity was "muzzle" (actually probably 10 or 15 feet) velocity. According to The Ammo Oracle ( https://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/term_velocity.html ) both the M193 and M855 bullets need 2500 to 2700 fps to fragment reliably. The fragmentation is a result of the upsetting, so you're looking at 2500 fps as an absolute minimum, and 2700 fps for some cushion for reliability.

But that's not muzzle velocity, that's velocity at the point of impact. So now you need to factor in how much velocity your bullets lose over a distance of 100 yards. In addition, if you aren't using the M193 or M855 bullets, you need to find out the minimum velocity that your bullets require in order to upset and fragment reliably. I don't know of anyone who tests and publishes that sort of information for aftermarket, commercial .223 projectiles. If you can't find it, you may have to invest in a couple or three blocks of Clear Ballistics Gel and start shooting it at 100 yards.

Or just use the 55-grain M193 bullet and call it good.

https://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/term_2700.html

Note that even with the 14-1/2" barrel of the M4 Carbine, the M855 round had problems in combat: https://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/term_m855yaw.html

From that article:

Interesting, few of these reports seem to be coming from troops 20" or SAW platforms. It would seem that the additional velocity from the longer barrel provides adequate usable fragmentation range for M855 in the majority of cases. From shorter barrels, such as the M4's 14.5" barrel, M855's fragmentation range varies from as much as 90m to as little as 10m, which frequently isn't enough range.

And you are looking at a 10-1/2" barrel ...
 
Last edited:

burrhead

New member
Using a Lab Radar, velocity drops off from 2700 at the muzzle to 2500 at 50yds. I haven't run the software to see what a 100yds would be but it'll be slow. BC on 55 grain bullets is not spectacular...mid 300s. I have shot coyotes out to about 500yds with Hornady 75 match, bullets using a 24" barrel and a MV of 2860. Bang flop. Srelok says they're still making 1870 at 500. Apples and oranges but it gives me some place to start. I'm curious what the MV will be on the 75s; low 2000s for sure.
 
Coyotes are varmints. People hunt coyotes out to 100 yards (or maybe more) with .22 Magnum. You are asking about "social" situations. You need to make more than a .22 caliber hole. That means either an expanding bullet, or a tumbling/fragmenting bullet.
 

burrhead

New member
Those 75 Hornadys do expand. Yes, I know they're "Match" bullets but they leave big exits on #30 animals. A person wouldn't think it but I've seen it. I just don't know at the moment what the 100yd velocity will be. A little experimentation is certainly called for.
 

Charlie98

New member
With 1:7 twist, I would probably try to find something in the 62-68grn range that it likes. If you expect to shoot at, say, 100yds, or wish the capability to do so, that's where I would test your load at. Reason I say that... my 1:7 H-bar displayed a serious dislike for the 55grn bullet, but yours may be different.

Is this a AR pistol or SBR?
 

kymasabe

New member
My 1:7 barrels prefer bullet weights in the 72-77 grain range, with Hornady's 75 grain BTHP as my go-to for hog hunting and home defense. 1:7 is a fast twist that likes heavier bullets. My basic 55 grain ammo is most accurate in my .223 Wylde 1:9 barrel.
 

MagnumWill

New member
Mine do very well with 75gr Hornady bullets, loaded with either TAC or CFE 223. All of my 5.56 loads with stick powder are "meh" at best, and all the ones I've loaded with spherical powders are a cut above in accuracy.

(Use at your own risk) but so far my favorite load is the 75gr Hornady BTHP Match as burr described, with 24.1gr of TAC and a CCI Small Rifle Magnum primer, loaded to 2.25" OAL so they still fit in the magazine.
 

Josh_Putman

New member
This is a chart I found online. It gives a general idea what SHOULD work with a given twist rate.

My understanding is that velocity also plays a large part in how a bullet will stabilize.
cf44658d4551a902109d4a4206e0d836.jpg


Sent from my LG-SP200 using Tapatalk
 

HiBC

New member
I'll agree a 1 in 7 is a good twist for the 75 gr Hornady Match BTHP. I suggest you NOT try the 75 gr A-Max.It just won't work loaded to magazine length.

I truly do not know what bullet would be most effective for you. You are not restricted by any military rules about non-expanding bullets.


Something like a 62 gr Varmint Ballistic tip might cause a lot of trauma,but it may not penetrate light cover. Berger hunting VLDS have a rep for trauma.
I think there is a 68/69 gr A-Max that would make a hole.

The new Sierra 77 gr MKs with the plastic point might open.

Answers require testing and a give and take on tradeoffs. A varmint bullet might be compromised by a yucca bush.

Some of the Barnse copper deer/hog bullets might be worth a look.
 

MagnumWill

New member
I suggest you NOT try the 75 gr A-Max.It just won't work loaded to magazine length.

Yes, that was somewhat obnoxious when I bought these and realized they're set at an OAL longer than 2.26". Good thing I didn't buy 500 of them :)
 

Nanuk

New member
In 5.56 my house social load is a 55 grain Nosler Ballistic tip. I built a AR Pistol in 40 S&W that takes Glock mags. With the hot 155's in the 8.5" barrel I am using it actually outperforms a 5.56 from a 7.5" barrel. It is magnitudes quieter as well.
 

bacardisteve

New member
75gr hornady is my favorite pill in all barell lengths. The hornady website has pics of it in ballistic gel testing at diffrent velocities. My 10yr old killed 2 deer with them from a 16" tube they left a nasty wound channel.
 
Top