your freedoms are protected by the constitution of the country, resp. the states?
The truth is, the Constitution of the United States, as well as those of other countries, are nothing more than a bunch of words. Paper doesn't protect anything.
What is more important is what the general population believes. If people are convinced that they do not have a right to do something, then they will not excersise that right. They will also not look kindly upon those who try to use their rights. So it is a matter of belief.
This is part of are struggle to keep our Second Amendment rights. Much of the voting public simply does not believe there is any inherent right to bear arms, nor any need.
It is also important that those whose job it is to enforce the laws believe you have the right to do something. Look at any police state. Without the backing of the military and police, the people are no longer suppressed and the dictator is toppled. While they back the dictator, the people are held in check, unable to excercise any rights, regardless of what is written on paper. Death squads and torturers are an effective way to scare a populus into submission. Marcos, for example, fell almost overnight when his army decided, en masse, they could not keep on killing there brothers and sisters and parents.
That is, admittedly, a force of arms arguement, but that is part of practical reality. Laws are what is enforced, and backed up by force. May things are technically illegal, but no law enforcement will do anything about it (laws against oral sex, for example).
And there is the old quote "chains do not make me a slave, and walls do not make a prison", I may have hacked it up. You have rights and you may excercise them at any time. You may also be punished for that, per government regulation, lawsuit, etc., but that does not mean that you don't have rights. In my mind, rights exist whether or not it is on paper. Paper is merely a recording of thoughts and laws.