I shoot a 5" .44 mag. Since most load data was originally developed with longer barrels in mind, I obviously get more muzzle flash/blast than those who were developing the load. If I want to choose a load with one goal being to minimize muzzle flash/blast from my shorter barrel would I get more benefit from: A), Going to a heavier bullet (which also uses less powder)? Or B), Choosing a slightly faster burning powder. Or, maybe both?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Adjusting .44 mag load to minimize muzzle blast
- Thread starter Doyle
- Start date
mikejonestkd
New member
A 5" barrel isn't really all that short and you still should get respectable velocity out of it
I like faster powders and lighter bullets for less muzzle blast
I like faster powders and lighter bullets for less muzzle blast
buck460XVR
New member
Some handgun powders have an added flash suppressant. BE-86 comes to mind. If muzzle flash was a concern of mine, I would contact the major powder manufacturers and see what recommendations they have. They would have a better grasp on this than most folks on gun forums.
I like faster powders and lighter bullets for less muzzle blast
I like faster powders and heavier bullets for less muzzle blast.
As Buck460XVR said, BE-86 comes to mind. Now my only 44 Mag has an 8-3/8" bbl, so I can't really use that as my baseline. (I would love to have a 629 Classic 5", btw.)
But I do have a 357 Mag w/ a 3" bbl, and that roughly translates to a 5" bbl in 44 Mag (roughly). I have had good luck with HS-6 loaded up real firm with a heavy 158gn JHP - flash is modest (counter-intuitively, if it's under-loaded, it gets flashy). Knowing this, I'd use HS-6 w/ a 240gn JHP for 44 Mag. If a lighter slug is preferred, moving to something even faster may be in order - like W231 or the like.
You might also try 9.0/Unique/240 SWC and work up to whatever power level you want. That load won't give you magnum performance, but you'll get to it from there quickly. Unique burns faster than Herco, and I love both of those powders. You might also mitigate some of the flash and blast by using a heavier-than-normal crimp, which facilitates more complete deflagration before the projectile leaves the case mouth.
I think the old classic load with Unique in the .44 Magnum was 11.2 gr./240 SWC, but approach with caution. If a faster powder than Unique is needed, I suggest Green Dot or Red Dot, in that order.
I think the old classic load with Unique in the .44 Magnum was 11.2 gr./240 SWC, but approach with caution. If a faster powder than Unique is needed, I suggest Green Dot or Red Dot, in that order.
You might search around for post listing low flash powders as well. I find that AA-5 and 9 produce less flash than similar powders used for similar loads. I load a LOT of #9 in my magnum revolvers since I hunt with them. The last thing you want in dimly lit woods is a huge bright flash to have you seeing spots after a shot.
I'm thinking that I'm going to go to a 265-270gr hard cast. The problem is powder. I just checked the only 2 local powder dealers and all I can get are Titegroup and H110. The H110 is great for full-power loads but doesn't scale down well. It's also pretty slow. Titegroup is fine for light target loads (and I'm thinking I'll get a bottle for that) but it doesn't scale up enough for a decent hunting load.
I guess I've got to keep hitting them up until they get some AA#9, 2400, etc. to make up a hunting load. If I can get somewhere close to 1200fps in a 265-270 WFN then I'll be happy.
I guess I've got to keep hitting them up until they get some AA#9, 2400, etc. to make up a hunting load. If I can get somewhere close to 1200fps in a 265-270 WFN then I'll be happy.
WVMountaineer
New member
Faster powder equals less powder. Heavier bullets for that faster powder equals less of that faster powder. Which decreases muzzle flash. If it were a concern for me, I'd do as Tim said and load a faster powder under a cast bullet of sorts. I prefer powder coated cast bullets. Shooting lead will require even less of the faster burning powder to achieved jacketed velocity's with the same powder. All will decrease muzzle flash. But, understand that creating a hot load for YOUR cast bullet can smoke quite a bit. Hence my preference for Powder coated lead bullets. A lot less smoke. Even in hot loads, Good luck and God Bless
Doyle
You picked .44 Magnum but that does not mean that you can not shoot .44 Special in it. If you do not want to shoot .44 Special then man up or sell it and drop down a caliber. It is just in the nature of the caliber of what you chose and there really is only so much that you can do about it.
You picked .44 Magnum but that does not mean that you can not shoot .44 Special in it. If you do not want to shoot .44 Special then man up or sell it and drop down a caliber. It is just in the nature of the caliber of what you chose and there really is only so much that you can do about it.
You might also try 9.0/Unique/240 SWC and work up to whatever power level you want. That load won't give you magnum performance, but you'll get to it from there quickly. Unique burns faster than Herco, and I love both of those powders. You might also mitigate some of the flash and blast by using a heavier-than-normal crimp, which facilitates more complete deflagration before the projectile leaves the case mouth
Couldn't said it better than KOSH. Also, leading won't be a problem with loads of 1000fps or less. I've been using Missouri Bullets 240SWC and they lead very little.
I suspect some people drive them just as fast or faster than jacketed bullets.
I shoot them both over the same powder charge. The cast bullets leave the gun faster
Hartcreek, I think you have misunderstood my intentions. I'm not recoil averse and I'm certainly capable of shooting full house magnum loads. However, this particular gun is not well suited to those loads. It's a 629 with a 5" barrel. If this were a Redhawk with a 7.5" barrel then I wouldn't be looking to do any thing different. Redhawks can take a steady diet of full magnum loads without damage - the 629's not so much. I figure while I'm at it I might as well try and load for flame reduction as well.
GeauxTide and Kosh have the right idea - except that my dealers haven't seen Unique on the shelves in a very long time. I've seen some interesting loads with Titegroup which my dealer does have.
GeauxTide and Kosh have the right idea - except that my dealers haven't seen Unique on the shelves in a very long time. I've seen some interesting loads with Titegroup which my dealer does have.
I guess I've got to keep hitting them up until they get some AA#9, 2400, etc. to make up a hunting load. If I can get somewhere close to 1200fps in a 265-270 WFN then I'll be happy.
If you are going for a low flash load suitable for hunting, you've greatly reduced your options. Unique will get you there, and have less flash than a magnum powder (replaced by smoke), but a hunting load is going to flash. Buck also mentioned Alliant BE-86 which is advertised as a "flash suppressent powder". I've never used it, but it sounds like the best deliberate attempt to make what you are looking for. Personally, I'd not worry about the flash, and concentrate on the best deer. I've been flashing the woods with 110/296 for years during deer season, and have never beenb blinded to the point that I couldn't see the deer drop, even in pre-sunrise dim light.
I also think its a mistake to assume that your 629 is not up to the task of digesting a steady diet of published loads for which it was made. True the Ruger can take more abuse, but loads within published standards are not abuse.
Last edited: