I've got two of them, one a 2", Stratford gun, (40XXXX S/N range), the other a 3" Bridgeport piece with a low 5 digit S/N (22xxx). Between the two of them, I've got about what a new Smith & Wesson would cost, invested. That's not to make any comparison to a Smith & Wesson, the Smith is a 'better" gun. I don't know that they shoot any better though.
I admit I got the first one, simply because I wanted a "snubbie" but didn't want to spend a lot of money on one. I went looking for a Taurus 85, found the CA, and thought I'd give it a try. I'm happy with it. I did replace the tiny little grips with a set of the neoprene ones that Charter puts on their new guns. MUCH better.
The 3" one I got, a few days ago, really because of the low S/N, and because I really don't think it had ever been fired. There was still that brownish looking packing goo all over it, and ozzing out of every pore. The fact that it was fairly inexpensive didn't hurt.
It cleaned up nicely and shot well yesterday.