In general, match bullets are thinner-skinned than hunting bullets because it is easier to keep a thin jacket uniform in the forming process. The small hollow point in match bullets is an artifact of the forming process which forms the base solid, then draws the sides of the cup up, stuffs it with lead, then forms the open end into the nose profile. That leaves the small open hole behind. It is too small to expand, which is why those bullets can now be used in combat by snipers and squad marksmen. The base is formed from the bottom of the jacket cup because its symmetry is much more important to accuracy than the nose's is. You can mess a nose up quite a bit without much visible effect on short range accuracy, but even small dings in a base can mess with your groups.
You will be pleased to learn that the negative effects of small asymmetries in the bullet mass have much more effect on the point of impact at long range than they do at 100 yards. I have had Hornady and Speer and Sierra hunting bullets print cloverleafs at 100 yards. You just need to get them lined up straight with your bore, so a Redding or Forster full sliding sleeve competition seater die may be in your future.
At short range, and especially with shorter bullet bearing surface, as lighter bullets have, it is generally easier to make a flat base bullet shoot accurately that a boattail. The time it takes to clear the muzzle exaggerates any asymmetric venting of gas due to slight crown imperfections. It is common for recrowning a factory barrel to improve accuracy. The effect seems to be visible about half the time, and it is most visible with boattail bullets. In my experience, the boattail design doesn't usually really shine till you get to around 300 yards and beyond. In some guns it only takes 200 to see a difference, but it is usually more like 300.
Match bullets kill things fairly well up to a certain size. Certainly the military snipers have had success with them. Berger used to advice against hunting with their match bullets, but has now stopped doing so, based on customer feedback. I just wouldn't expect as fast a stop as an expanding bullet gives in most circumstances. It is hard to be certain, because match bullets tend to shed their jackets in game, leaving a fairly blunt lead mass. Veral Smith's work with flat meplat solids show they often kill as fast and hard as expanding bullets. So there's no absolute certainty about comparative lethality here in any particular situation, though I would feel a lot more secure against dangerous game with a blunt lead projectile that was hard cast, like the Beartooth Bullets or Laser Cast LBT type designs, and not the soft swaged lead core of a match bullet.
That said, there are few flat base match bullets except from the benchrest bullet makers. The Berger #30407 is a flat base 150 grain match bullet that you will find does extremely well. Berger bullets have equaled or bettered the Sierras in my tests, so quality isn't an issue. Sierra doesn't make a flat base 150 grain match bullet, but Berger doesn't make a 150 grain flat base hunting bullet. So the Sierra #2150 ProHunter would be my choice for a 100 yard hunting bullet. You could also try the Hornady 150 grain flat base Interlock. It has a cannelure, and so is likely to be a little harder to achieve perfection with than the Sierra, but it will be less expensive and, in my .222 Remington, the Hornady flat base spire point, despite its cannelure, outshot the Sierra boattails at 100 yards, so it's worth a try. Your gun just may like them best, and there is no arguing with success.
As you work up loads for accuracy, be aware that the best pet load on the planet will not make a rifle shoot bug holes if the crown is off, or it shifts in its stock, or if the lugs aren't lapped to mate perfectly. Crowning, bedding, and lug lapping are almost automatic for me these days. So is firelapping if the barrel is not a custom hand-lapped barrel. I want the bore straight and smooth enough not to foul significantly during an extended course of fire.