Choosing the right concealed carry pistol is a deeply personal decision, heavily influenced by individual needs and preferences. The Smith & Wesson 642 and 638 are both popular choices, renowned for their reliability and compact size, but they have key differences that make one a better fit for certain users than the other. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which is right for you.
Key Differences: Material and Action
The most significant difference between the Smith & Wesson 642 and 638 lies in their construction materials and action type:
-
Smith & Wesson 642: This model features an aluminum alloy frame, making it lighter than its stainless steel counterpart. The lighter weight contributes to easier concealment and comfortable carry, especially for extended periods. It also boasts a double-action-only (DAO) trigger, meaning each shot requires a separate, complete trigger pull.
-
Smith & Wesson 638: Constructed with a stainless steel frame, the 638 is more durable and resistant to wear and tear. The added weight, while potentially less comfortable for some, can contribute to improved recoil management. Like the 642, it also has a double-action-only (DAO) trigger.
Similarities: Caliber, Capacity, and Features
Despite their material differences, the 642 and 638 share several critical similarities:
-
Caliber: Both are chambered in .38 Special +P, a potent round suitable for self-defense. The "+P" designation indicates that the cartridge is loaded to a higher pressure than standard .38 Special rounds, offering increased stopping power.
-
Capacity: Both revolvers hold five rounds, a standard capacity for their size.
-
Features: Both models typically include a shrouded hammer (for snag-free concealment), a smooth trigger pull (typical of DAO revolvers), and simple, reliable mechanics. They are both known for their simplicity and ease of maintenance.
Performance Considerations: Recoil and Accuracy
While both revolvers are manageable, there are subtle differences in recoil and accuracy:
-
Recoil: The lighter aluminum frame of the 642 results in slightly sharper recoil. The heavier 638 absorbs some of the recoil, leading to a softer shooting experience for many users.
-
Accuracy: Both revolvers are accurate enough for self-defense at close ranges. However, the heavier weight and slightly less felt recoil of the 638 might offer a slight edge in accuracy for some shooters, particularly those with less experience. This difference, however, is often marginal and depends greatly on individual shooting skills and technique.
Choosing the Right Revolver: A Practical Guide
The "best" revolver depends entirely on your priorities and personal preferences.
Choose the Smith & Wesson 642 if:
- Lightweight Concealment is Paramount: The lighter weight makes it ideal for all-day carry.
- Budget is a Concern: It is often slightly less expensive than the 638.
- You Prioritize Easy Concealment Over Recoil Management: The lighter weight is beneficial for concealment but leads to more recoil.
Choose the Smith & Wesson 638 if:
- Durability and Longevity are Top Priorities: The stainless steel construction resists corrosion and wear better.
- You Prefer a Softer Recoil: The heavier weight mitigates recoil.
- You are Sensitive to Recoil: The added weight aids in recoil management, making it more comfortable to shoot.
Conclusion
Both the Smith & Wesson 642 and 638 are excellent concealed carry revolvers. The decision ultimately boils down to personal preference regarding weight, recoil management, and budget. Consider your individual needs and priorities carefully before making your purchase. This detailed comparison should help you make an informed choice that best suits your self-defense requirements. Always practice safe gun handling techniques and consult with a firearms professional before purchasing any firearm.
