Choosing between a Smith & Wesson 686 and a Ruger GP100 is a common dilemma for revolver enthusiasts. Both are renowned for their reliability, durability, and accuracy, but they cater to slightly different preferences. This in-depth comparison will analyze key features, helping you determine which revolver best suits your needs.
Key Differences: A Head-to-Head Comparison
Both the S&W 686 and the Ruger GP100 are .357 Magnum revolvers capable of firing .38 Special ammunition. However, several key distinctions set them apart:
1. Action Type:
-
S&W 686: Features a double-action/single-action (DA/SA) trigger mechanism. This allows for both double-action (pulling the trigger directly to fire) and single-action (cocking the hammer manually before firing) shooting. The DA pull is generally smoother on the 686, though this can vary based on specific models and trigger jobs.
-
Ruger GP100: Also boasts a DA/SA trigger mechanism. The GP100's DA trigger pull is known to be heavier and grittier than the 686's out of the box, although this can be improved with aftermarket tuning or a professional trigger job. The single-action pull, however, is often considered crisper on the GP100.
2. Frame Material & Construction:
-
S&W 686: Typically constructed with a forged steel frame, resulting in a more robust and arguably more refined feel. This contributes to the gun's overall balance and perceived quality.
-
Ruger GP100: Usually features a cast steel frame, though Ruger's casting process is highly regarded for its strength and precision. The cast frame can be slightly heavier than the forged frame of the 686. While strong, some users find the cast frame's aesthetic less refined than the forged steel of its S&W competitor.
3. Cylinder Release:
-
S&W 686: Employs a side-mounted cylinder release, which many shooters find more intuitive and faster to operate.
-
Ruger GP100: Utilizes a push-button cylinder release located on the crane (the part of the revolver that connects the cylinder to the frame). While functional, this design can be less convenient for some users, particularly those with larger hands.
4. Weight and Size:
- Both revolvers are substantial and well-balanced, but the specific weights vary depending on barrel length and model. Generally, the Ruger GP100 tends to be slightly heavier than the S&W 686 for comparable barrel lengths. This added weight can help reduce felt recoil.
5. Features & Variations:
- Both S&W and Ruger offer various models within their 686 and GP100 lines, including different barrel lengths, finishes (e.g., stainless steel, blued), and sight options. Research specific models to find the features that best fit your needs and budget.
Which Revolver is Right for You?
The best revolver depends entirely on your priorities and shooting style.
Choose the Smith & Wesson 686 if:
- You prioritize a smoother double-action trigger pull.
- You prefer a side-mounted cylinder release.
- You value a potentially more refined feel and aesthetics associated with a forged steel frame.
Choose the Ruger GP100 if:
- You prefer a potentially more durable and heavier revolver.
- You don't mind a heavier double-action trigger pull (though this can be mitigated with aftermarket upgrades).
- You appreciate a slightly more rugged and potentially more affordable option.
Beyond the Basics: Maintenance and Accessories
Both the S&W 686 and Ruger GP100 are reliable firearms known for their longevity. Regular cleaning and maintenance are crucial for optimal performance and safety. Numerous aftermarket accessories, such as grips, sights, and trigger components, are available for both revolvers, allowing for significant customization to suit individual preferences.
Ultimately, handling both revolvers (if possible) and considering your personal shooting style will lead you to the best choice. Researching specific models within each line will help you further narrow your decision.
