Choosing a compact 9mm pistol can be a daunting task, especially with so many excellent options on the market. Two standouts frequently compared are the Glock 19 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0. Both are incredibly popular and reliable handguns, but they cater to slightly different preferences. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which pistol best suits your needs.
Key Features & Specifications
Before diving into the specifics, let's lay out some core features to set the stage for our comparison:
| Feature | Glock 19 | Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Caliber | 9mm Luger | 9mm Luger |
| Action | Safe Action (striker-fired) | Striker-fired |
| Capacity | 15 rounds (standard magazine) | 15 rounds (standard magazine) |
| Weight (approx.) | 23.6 oz (unloaded) | 24.1 oz (unloaded) |
| Barrel Length | 4.02 inches | 3.6 inches |
| Overall Length | 7.36 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Grip Texture | Aggressive stippling | Interchangeable backstraps |
| Ambidextrous Features | Magazine release, reversible backstrap (optional) | Magazine release, slide stop |
Ergonomics and Feel: A Matter of Preference
The feel of a pistol is subjective. The Glock 19's aggressive stippling provides a secure grip, even with sweaty hands. However, this can be abrasive for some. The M&P 2.0 Compact's interchangeable backstraps allow for customization, making it adaptable to a wider range of hand sizes. This makes the M&P 2.0 potentially more comfortable for users with smaller or larger hands. Ultimately, the best way to decide is to handle both pistols.
Trigger Pull: Distinct Characteristics
Both pistols utilize a striker-fired mechanism, but their trigger pulls differ significantly. The Glock 19's trigger is known for its somewhat stiff and long pull, with a noticeable break. The M&P 2.0 Compact boasts a lighter, smoother, and shorter trigger pull, generally regarded as more comfortable for many shooters. This is a significant factor to consider for both concealed carry and target shooting.
Accuracy and Reliability: Top-Tier Performance
Both the Glock 19 and the M&P 2.0 Compact are renowned for their reliability and accuracy. They are both exceptionally durable and capable of handling thousands of rounds without significant issues. Minor differences in accuracy may depend more on the shooter than the firearm itself. Both are suitable for self-defense, target shooting, and competition.
Concealed Carry Considerations: Size and Weight
The Glock 19 and the M&P 2.0 Compact are both designed for concealed carry, offering a good balance of size, capacity, and firepower. The M&P 2.0 Compact is slightly smaller and lighter, which might make it a more comfortable choice for all-day concealed carry for some individuals. However, the difference is minimal. Both are manageable for most individuals.
The Verdict: It Depends on Your Needs
There's no single "winner" in this comparison. The best choice depends entirely on your individual preferences and priorities.
-
Choose the Glock 19 if: You prefer a more aggressive grip, a familiar design (it’s a classic for a reason!), and are comfortable with a slightly stiffer trigger.
-
Choose the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact if: You prioritize a customizable grip, prefer a lighter and smoother trigger, and slightly prefer a more compact size.
Remember to handle both pistols before making a decision. Consider renting them at a local range to see which one feels more comfortable and natural in your hand. This personal experience will ultimately be the most valuable factor in your choice.
